2022
DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2022.2122768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intuitive thinking impedes cooperation by decreasing cooperative expectations for pro-self but not for pro-social individuals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 72 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies highlight how sustainability compromises the perceived quality of luxury products (Dekhili et al , 2019) and how the excess nature of luxury conflicts with the conservation focus of sustainability (Kapferer and Michaut-Denizeau, 2020). While some studies link luxury product characteristics such as scarcity, timelessness and durability to sustainability (Osburg et al , 2021; Sun et al , 2023), these characteristics merely establish a functional rather than a psychological link between the concepts. Scholars distinguish between the self-interested nature of “luxury consumption” and the altruistic nature of “sustainable consumption” (White et al , 2019), referred to as the “pro-self” vs “pro-social” paradox (Athwal et al , 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies highlight how sustainability compromises the perceived quality of luxury products (Dekhili et al , 2019) and how the excess nature of luxury conflicts with the conservation focus of sustainability (Kapferer and Michaut-Denizeau, 2020). While some studies link luxury product characteristics such as scarcity, timelessness and durability to sustainability (Osburg et al , 2021; Sun et al , 2023), these characteristics merely establish a functional rather than a psychological link between the concepts. Scholars distinguish between the self-interested nature of “luxury consumption” and the altruistic nature of “sustainable consumption” (White et al , 2019), referred to as the “pro-self” vs “pro-social” paradox (Athwal et al , 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%