2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrusiveness from an attachment theory perspective: A dyadic diary study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study comprised 60 Israeli teacher participants, in line with the recommended sample size for multilevel modeling of this kind (Maas and Hox, 2005) and used in similar dailydiary studies (e.g., Lavy et al, 2013;Lavy and Eshet, 2018). Most participants were women (74%), corresponding with the majority of women teaching in Israel.…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study comprised 60 Israeli teacher participants, in line with the recommended sample size for multilevel modeling of this kind (Maas and Hox, 2005) and used in similar dailydiary studies (e.g., Lavy et al, 2013;Lavy and Eshet, 2018). Most participants were women (74%), corresponding with the majority of women teaching in Israel.…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a diary study of dating couples [19], daily interactions were rated as more negative in emotional tone when either the respondent or the partner was high in attachment anxiety; emotional tone was most negative if the female partner was high on both anxiety and avoidance, and least negative if the male partner was low on both dimensions. In another diary study [20], own anxiety and partner's avoidance predicted self-reported Table 1 Conflict-related correlates of attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance. intrusive behaviors (e.g.…”
Section: Attachment and Conflict: Empirical Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, these individuals believe that negative affect is unmanageable alone. Further, based on the inconsistent support from their primary caregivers (Fonagy, ), they believe that in order to have their attachment needs met, they must hyperactivate their expressions of distress, through clinging behavior or coercive demanding responses to loved ones (Lavy, Mikulincer, & Shaver, ). Unfortunately, this hyperactivating behavior interferes with their ability to provide responsive caregiving to their partner (Mikulincer, Shaver, Bar‐On, & Sahdra, ).…”
Section: Emotionally Focused Couple Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%