2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2019.06.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrusion recognition method based on echo state network for optical fiber perimeter security systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning an optical packet switching network, a correct recognition of the optical packet header is crucial, which can ensure that the data are transmitted to a correct route [ 27 , 28 ]. If the multiple-input multiple-output optoelectronic RC system can successfully realize the simultaneous recognition of the multiple-route optical packet headers, it can be employed as an important equipment for the optical network switching nodes.…”
Section: Simulation Results Of Signal Recognitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning an optical packet switching network, a correct recognition of the optical packet header is crucial, which can ensure that the data are transmitted to a correct route [ 27 , 28 ]. If the multiple-input multiple-output optoelectronic RC system can successfully realize the simultaneous recognition of the multiple-route optical packet headers, it can be employed as an important equipment for the optical network switching nodes.…”
Section: Simulation Results Of Signal Recognitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With reference to the above experimental setup, according to this method, the characteristic of fiber vibration signal was extracted, obtaining the characteristics of intrusion signals such as shaking protection nets, knocking protection nets, and over-protection fences, and obtaining their respective feature sets after condensing. The method of reference from [4], the method of reference from [5], and the proposed method were used to identify and identify the intrusion signals. The recognition results were obtained by identifying and comparing the features.…”
Section: Comparison Of Intrusion Signal Recognition Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dividing the correct recognition of each category by the number of test signals and calculating the accuracy of their identification, we received the results shown in Table 1. According to the data in Table 1, the average recognition accuracy rate of intrusion signal of reference [4] method is 79.9%, that of reference [5] method is 76.6%, and that of the proposed method is as high as 94.4%. It can be seen that the recognition accuracy of intrusion signals such as the shaking protection net, striking protection net, and crossing the protection fence of the proposed method are higher than those of the reference [4] method and the reference [5] method.…”
Section: Comparison Of Intrusion Signal Recognition Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations