2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:phen.0000041900.30172.e8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introspection and subliminal perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
429
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 428 publications
(443 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
13
429
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The confidence of detection was also reduced. This observation supports previous findings of the effects of TMS on target detection when applied to the primary visual cortex (11) and the effects on perceptual clarity when applied over the temporal lobe in a purely visual task (12,13).…”
Section: Tms Decreases the Ability To Identify The Target Arrow Figuressupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The confidence of detection was also reduced. This observation supports previous findings of the effects of TMS on target detection when applied to the primary visual cortex (11) and the effects on perceptual clarity when applied over the temporal lobe in a purely visual task (12,13).…”
Section: Tms Decreases the Ability To Identify The Target Arrow Figuressupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Simple binary choices, where subjects only respond positively or negatively to whether they have perceived a visual stimulus, have proven not to capture the graded nature of visual perception. We therefore adopted a modified version of the perception awareness scale (12,13) in which subjects rate the clarity of their perceptual experience on an ordinal scale. Similar subjective measures of clarity have been used in patients (14), and it has proven to be a more indicative measure of perceptual clarity than strict dichotic measures (12,13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They were instructed to indicate the Gabor's orientation (left or right), and then to indicate their subjective visibility of the Gabor with a "seen" or "guess" judgment (experiment 1) or a rating on the four-point, perceptual awareness scale (PAS; experiment 2). The PAS was used in the second experiment to assess awareness using a more fine-grained and established scale of subjective visibility (17). The…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment contained 72 trials and lasted around 1 h. The different adaptors were presented in randomized order. In the invisible condition, participants were asked to indicate their subjective experience of the apparent motion adaptor (Ramsøy & Overgaard, 2004): they pressed a key from 1 to 4, corresponding respectively to ''no perceptual experience'', ''a brief glimpse'', ''an almost clear image'', or ''a perfectly clear image'' of apparent motion.…”
Section: Adaptation Phase Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%