1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00333970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intron mutations that affect the splicing efficiency of the CYH2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Abstract: To define the extent of intervening sequences required for efficient splicing of the CYH2 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we have constructed a series of intron mutations. Artificial intron extensions of more than 300 bp of the natural intron lead to an inhibition of splicing whereas intron deletions lead to a drastic improvement of the splicing efficiency. It is shown that deletion of a 32 bp sequence element within the intron is responsible for this drastic improvement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(28) tations promote mRNA destabilization, whereas 3'-proximal nonsense mutations have little or no effect on mRNA decay rates. This is exemplified by the decay rates of mutant (20,21). Based on this criterion, the CYH2 and RPSIB pre-mRNAs are inefficiently spliced (21)(22)(23) 3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(28) tations promote mRNA destabilization, whereas 3'-proximal nonsense mutations have little or no effect on mRNA decay rates. This is exemplified by the decay rates of mutant (20,21). Based on this criterion, the CYH2 and RPSIB pre-mRNAs are inefficiently spliced (21)(22)(23) 3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is exemplified by the decay rates of mutant (20,21). Based on this criterion, the CYH2 and RPSIB pre-mRNAs are inefficiently spliced (21)(22)(23) 3. RNA blotting analysis ofthe polysomal distribution ofthe MER2 pre-mRNA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The exons (EX1 and EX2 in Fig. 1A) and intron were based on the relatively inefficiently spliced yeast RPL28/CYH2 gene (Swida et al 1986) to increase the chances that the unspliced transcript levels were detectable. More details, including the cloning strategy and the DNA sequence can be found in the Supplemental Material.…”
Section: Design and Validation Of The Eukaryotic Gene Expression Repomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no alternative splice sites were detected, suggesting that this mutation did not form alternative splicing isoform. Several reported documents had presented that intron mutations also affected expression and regulation of genes (Swida et al 1986;Zhao et al, 2004;Lai et al, 2009), but this mutation could not affected the expression or regulation of the bovine Six3 gene using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction detecting system with different genotypic p=0.04* p=0.04* Note: Means of body weight and average daily gain with different superscript letters (e.g. "a" and "b") show significant difference (LSD test, *p < 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%