Introduksjonsprogram for flyktninger i norske kommuner

Tronstad, Kristian Rose

doi:10.7577/nibr/rapport/2015/2

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 7 publications

(9 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Among migration-related social policies, which cover most social policy related areas, formal institutions dominate -for example, laws, regulations, public agencies, and organizations -while informal institutions -culture, attitudes, norms, or values -are scarce. The neglect of informal institutions in migration-related social policies results in misunderstandings and cultural clashes, which can be assumed to reduce immigration's positive social impacts (Søholt et al 2012;Tronstad 2015). Successful migration-related social policies therefore need to target all the involved actors, both immigrants and natives, as well as formal institutions (laws, rules, rights) and informal institutions (values, norms, attitudes).…”

Section: What Is Social Impact and Why Assess It?mentioning

confidence: 99%

On the potential of immigration for the remote areas of Europe: an introduction

Laine¹,

Rauhut²,

Gruber³

2023

Assessing the Social Impact of Immigration in Europe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Migration to Europe tends to be fundamentally misconstrued and misrepresented, both in numbers and in relation to its core dynamics and asserted implications for European economies and societies (Ardittis 2017; Laine 2020a; Laine, Moyo and Nshimbi 2020). European public opinion significantly overestimates the number of non-EU immigrants: most of the 19 European Union (EU) Member States' citizens perceive the proportion of immigrants to be at least twice the actual figure (Eurobarometer 469). As the statistics clearly indicate, migration -both regular and irregular -is a global rather than a European phenomenon. While Europe has been and increasingly continues to be a popular migrant destination the numbers appear less momentous in a global assessment. This becomes especially evident when refugees are considered, 83 per cent of whom are hosted in low-and middle-income countries, and 72 per cent in their respective neighbouring countries (UNHCR 2021). Turkey hosts the largest number of refugees, at 3.8 million people, significantly outnumbering all the EU countries. Germany currently tops the EU ranking as the largest refugee-hosting country, with 1.3 million refugees. When considering refugees as a proportion of the total population, Sweden's enduring and generous refugee policy tops the EU ranking at 2.6 per cent, far behind Lebanon (19.8 per cent) and Jordan (10.4 per cent). Russia's unprovoked aggression against Ukraine has forced millions to flee their homes, leading to major displacement crises, but note this is beyond this book's scope because the data collection was largely concluded before the war's onset.Overall global migration is grossly exaggerated. The international migrant total currently comprises 3.6 per cent of the global population (IOM 2022; UN DESA 2022). The vast majority of the global population -around 96.4

show abstract

Section: What Is Social Impact and Why Assess It?mentioning

confidence: 99%

On the potential of immigration for the remote areas of Europe: an introduction

Laine¹,

Rauhut²,

Gruber³

2023

Assessing the Social Impact of Immigration in Europe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Vår studie peker på at dette er utfordrende. Godt samarbeid mellom kommune og naeringsliv, og politisk og administrativ forankring bidrar positivt til arbeidsinkludering både i Danmark og Norge (Hansen, Frederiksen & Eskelinen 2006;Tronstad 2015).…”

Section: Diskusjonunclassified

“…Vår studie viser at det er behov for ytterligere forskning på hvordan samarbeidsrelasjonene påvirker praksis og dermed måloppnåelsen i introduksjonsprogrammet. Tronstad (2015) påpeker at noen kommuner lykkes bedre enn andre med arbeidsinkludering, nettopp på grunn av samarbeid. Røiseland og Lo (2019) anbefaler at samarbeid mellom offentlige, private og sivile aktører bør skje gjennom å dele kunnskap og ressurser med hverandre.…”

Section: Avsluttende Betraktningerunclassified

Arbeidsinkludering av flyktninger gjennom praksis – En flernivåstudie av arbeidsgiveres synspunkter på det å tilby praksis

Fedreheim¹,

Hansen²,

Aure³

2022

SPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Deltakelse i arbeidslivet er sentralt for inkludering av flyktninger. Denne artikkelen baserer seg på kvalitative intervjuer med arbeidsgivere, og studerer deres syn på bruk av praksisplasser til kvalifisering av flyktninger. Vi bruker mangfoldsledelsens flernivåperspektiv som analytisk rammeverk og finner at arbeidsgiverne ønsker mer systematikk rundt tilretteleggingen av praksis, inkludert bedre samarbeid mellom de ulike aktørene, at arbeidsgiverne motiveres av tanken på en mangfoldig arbeidsstokk, at arbeidsgiverne er opptatt av å forvalte mangfoldet, men også av å likebehandle alle sine ansatte, og at de ønsker at kommunene selv tilbyr flere praksisplasser.

show abstract