2018
DOI: 10.1139/cjss-2018-0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introductory soil courses: a frontier of soil science education in Canada

Abstract: As the focus of soil science education in Canada and elsewhere has shifted towards nonsoil science majors, it is important to understand if and how this has affected the scope of introductory soil science courses. The objectives of this study were to inventory Canadian postsecondary units that offer introductory soil science courses and to document attributes of instructors, students, and teaching approaches in these courses. We surveyed 58% of the instructors of introductory soil science courses across Canada… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no consistent, significant relationship detected between class size, land‐grant status, or Carnegie classification and the percentages of these teaching styles. This appears to indicate a higher percentage of diverse teaching approaches employed in the respondents of our survey than those reported in a survey of Canadian institutions, which indicated that lectures were a much more predominant form of teaching style (Krzic et al, 2018). These results appear to show that the ISS e instructors surveyed in our study tend to be highly innovative, regardless of their professional background or academic position.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…There was no consistent, significant relationship detected between class size, land‐grant status, or Carnegie classification and the percentages of these teaching styles. This appears to indicate a higher percentage of diverse teaching approaches employed in the respondents of our survey than those reported in a survey of Canadian institutions, which indicated that lectures were a much more predominant form of teaching style (Krzic et al, 2018). These results appear to show that the ISS e instructors surveyed in our study tend to be highly innovative, regardless of their professional background or academic position.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Soils are also at the core of many environmental issues we face today. It is therefore vital that land managers and the general public have an understanding of the importance of soils in order to maintain or enhance global soil resources (Krzic et al, 2018). This must begin with the postsecondary curricula that adequately cover the roles of soil in the context of global issues (Bruyn et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches aim to enhance student engagement, improve critical thinking and problem‐solving skills, and contribute to peer‐learning (Prince, Borrego, Henderson, Cutler, & Froyd, 2013; Santos, Figueiredo, & Vierira, 2019). In soil science education, however, traditional forms of instruction (lectures, labs, and field trips) remain predominant (Krzic et al., 2018; Parr, Trexler, Khkanna, & Battisti, 2007). Although the importance of active learning has been stressed (e.g., David & Bell, 2018; Valley, Wittman, Jordan, Ahmed, & Galt, 2018), widespread adoption of innovative teaching practices within agricultural, natural resource, and soil science curricula has been limited (McKim, Pauley, Velez, & Sorensen, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…instruction (lectures, labs, and field trips) remain predominant (Krzic et al, 2018;Parr, Trexler, Khkanna, & Battisti, 2007). Although the importance of active learning has been stressed (e.g., David & Bell, 2018;Valley, Wittman, Jordan, Ahmed, & Galt, 2018), widespread adoption of innovative teaching practices within agricultural, natural resource, and soil science curricula has been limited (McKim, Pauley, Velez, & Sorensen, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%