Introduction

Hamid, Usman; Khan, Pasha M.

doi:10.1215/1089201x-4279200

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the European context, enlightenment thinkers like Kant envisioned cosmopolitanism as a utopian political order in which peace among all people is maintained. Elsewhere, cosmopolitanism has other histories, meanings, and values, and some of these have to an extent come into social existence in various places throughout history (Pollock et al 2000; Ho 2002; Hamid and Khan P.M. 2017).…”

Section: Cosmopolitanism and Orientalism In Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

Opera as Critical “Synthesis”: Theorizing the Interface between Cosmopolitanism and Orientalism

O’Connor

2023

Comp Stud Soc Hist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For centuries, European operas have portrayed dramatic, exotic Others on stage. However, as opera is increasingly adopted around the world, including by those “Eastern” Others it orientalized, its Othering tendencies serve new, more critical purposes. Post-colonial studies of knowledge and cultural production have shown how relations between centers and peripheries, knowledge and power are integral to forms of orientalism. In Tajikistan, the accounts of opera told today by the daughter of a successful Soviet Tajik composer bring to light the ambiguity of power relations and positionalities in Soviet opera’s production. Her accounts, beyond highlighting opera’s readily apparent orientalist tendencies, reveal surprising cosmopolitan aspirations in Soviet Central Asian opera. Cosmopolitan histories and values also feature heavily in post-colonial politics of knowledge production, but the concept appears worlds apart from, even in opposition to that of orientalism: the latter feeds off center-periphery, knowledge-power relations, while the former aspires to evade them. Through this present-day account of opera’s development in Soviet Tajikistan, this article challenges this opposition, theorizing a conceptual ambiguity and interdependence between orientalism and cosmopolitanism, which has important consequences for knowledge-producing fields like opera, as well as anthropology. Multiple forms of orientalism and cosmopolitanism overlapped and interacted in the development of Soviet Central Asian opera as numerous, intersecting meanings and socio-political agendas went into its production. Ultimately, a conceptual space emerges between the orientalism(s) and cosmopolitanism(s) at play. This ambiguous space in-between offers a lens for critically evaluating the complex, uneven practice of portraying and engaging with Others.

show abstract

Section: Cosmopolitanism and Orientalism In Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%