Handbook of Evaluation Methods for Health Informatics 2006
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012370464-1/50005-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A longer time-frame of evaluation would be required to demonstrate any causal link between the intervention and effects on patient care and management. For example, a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to reliably assess effect and efficiency should only be conducted when the system has achieved reasonable stability [ 21 , 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A longer time-frame of evaluation would be required to demonstrate any causal link between the intervention and effects on patient care and management. For example, a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to reliably assess effect and efficiency should only be conducted when the system has achieved reasonable stability [ 21 , 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A two-step quasi-experimental design was used to evaluate the adaptive phase of a teleneurophysiology intervention [ 21 - 24 ]. Using a one-group posttest-only approach, post-intervention observations were made without reference to any control group or control period [ 22 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations