1989
DOI: 10.2307/2928519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As emphasized at the beginning, I focused only on the national aspect of memory politics, which means that various forms of counter-memory (Davis and Starn 1989;Young 1999) were left aside. Nor did my analysis involve the party-political dimension of memory politics; that is I did not Nationalities Papers examine which political forces stood behind one or another memory-political decision.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As emphasized at the beginning, I focused only on the national aspect of memory politics, which means that various forms of counter-memory (Davis and Starn 1989;Young 1999) were left aside. Nor did my analysis involve the party-political dimension of memory politics; that is I did not Nationalities Papers examine which political forces stood behind one or another memory-political decision.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on the approach of Davis and Starn (1989), I inquire into how 'the private sphere and the practices of everyday life define and conserve alternatives to the official memory of public historiography ' (1989: 5) and ask by whom, where, in which context, and against what nostalgic memories are invoked (Davis and Starn (1989):2). I argue that people who disagree with a blackand-white view on socialism -who do not deny the difficulties but who also recall various positive aspects of those times -do not necessarily relate solely to the past in doing so.…”
Section: Nostalgia: Between Past and Presentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we accept that both are constructed entities, we may consider the tension between them to be productive rather than at odds. 18 A case in point is the relationship of individual memory, long considered a legitimate source for historians, and collective memory. An individual memory is subject to change and is dependent on time and place, in effect having a history of its own, which of course is true of collective memory, or ideas about the past that are popularly shared in a society.…”
Section: History and Collective Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%