2020
DOI: 10.1353/sac.2020.0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In short, Chaucer denies neither men nor women the privilege of being morally good or bad; his Tales overlooks neither men's agency nor women's. Thus, it is unfeasible to view Chaucer as a feminist or masculinist, but as a fence‐sitter authority who challenges “not only the canon, but also our anachronistic modern understandings of reading practices, which often seem to privilege masculinist subjectivity” (Miles & Watt, 2020, p. 290). The poet sides with neither men nor women, but establishes a gender‐opaque zone that does not have any gender hierarchies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In short, Chaucer denies neither men nor women the privilege of being morally good or bad; his Tales overlooks neither men's agency nor women's. Thus, it is unfeasible to view Chaucer as a feminist or masculinist, but as a fence‐sitter authority who challenges “not only the canon, but also our anachronistic modern understandings of reading practices, which often seem to privilege masculinist subjectivity” (Miles & Watt, 2020, p. 290). The poet sides with neither men nor women, but establishes a gender‐opaque zone that does not have any gender hierarchies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%