2015
DOI: 10.1057/eps.2015.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

introduction: women in european political science

Abstract: This symposium explores the ways in which women are descriptively represented in political science, by exploring the ways in which they are positioned institutionally in Spain, Finland, Germany and the United Kingdom. The symposium also explores the ways in which structures may serve to disadvantage women, by analysing HE policy and citation practices. Critical theory reminds us that in observing power structures we can seek to change them, and so our conclusion reflects on some more practical suggestions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since our survey, there has been a significant growth in the literature examining the gendered nature of political science across a variety of regional contexts, including the UK (Allen and Savigny, 2016; Awesti et al, 2016; Briggs and Harrison, 2015; Savigny, 2014; Williams et al, 2015), the US (Mitchell et al, 2013; Mitchell and Hesli, 2013; Mitchell and Martin, 2018; Monroe et al, 2014), Europe (Abels and Woods, 2015; Ballen et al, 2018; Bates and Savigny, 2015b; Elizondo, 2015; Kantola, 2015), Australia and New Zealand (Johnson, 2014; Sawer and Curtin, 2016) and Latin America (Rocha Carpiuc, 2016). Despite formal equality policies and measures designed to address structural inequalities, this research highlights the continued barriers women face within political science departments as well as wider practices within academia that can serve to disadvantage women.…”
Section: The Status Of Women In the Profession: Literature And Initiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since our survey, there has been a significant growth in the literature examining the gendered nature of political science across a variety of regional contexts, including the UK (Allen and Savigny, 2016; Awesti et al, 2016; Briggs and Harrison, 2015; Savigny, 2014; Williams et al, 2015), the US (Mitchell et al, 2013; Mitchell and Hesli, 2013; Mitchell and Martin, 2018; Monroe et al, 2014), Europe (Abels and Woods, 2015; Ballen et al, 2018; Bates and Savigny, 2015b; Elizondo, 2015; Kantola, 2015), Australia and New Zealand (Johnson, 2014; Sawer and Curtin, 2016) and Latin America (Rocha Carpiuc, 2016). Despite formal equality policies and measures designed to address structural inequalities, this research highlights the continued barriers women face within political science departments as well as wider practices within academia that can serve to disadvantage women.…”
Section: The Status Of Women In the Profession: Literature And Initiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is a matter of reflection for the future of the editorial policy of EPS. The gender gap in political science, as well as the need for gender studies, has received attention (Bates et al 2012 ; Bates and Savigny 2015 ; Evans and Amery 2016 ). The EPS publication record reflects this need.…”
Section: A Journey Through the History Of Epsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, our articles situate European Political Science in comparison with North American Political Science (Jenne 2009) and discuss commonalities and differences in research traditions between European countries (Camerlo and Terra 2018). Over the past two decades, we have also been a recurrent voice for more diversity and inclusion in the discipline, in particular advocating for gender equality (Bates and Savigny 2015). Moreover, we have captured worrying developments in parts of Europe and elsewhere, which compromise the academic liberty of the discipline in countries such as Hungary (Bárd 2020).…”
Section: The Evolution Of Eps From 2001 To 2021mentioning
confidence: 99%