2012
DOI: 10.1007/s13412-012-0098-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: why link Indigenous ways of knowing with the teaching of environmental studies and sciences?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Materi yang abstrak membutuhkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif untuk dapat memahami. Materi abstrak dapat dipresentasikan atau dijabarkan menggunakan local wisdom suatu daerah dan bisa lebih mudah dipahami (Rich, 2012).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Materi yang abstrak membutuhkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif untuk dapat memahami. Materi abstrak dapat dipresentasikan atau dijabarkan menggunakan local wisdom suatu daerah dan bisa lebih mudah dipahami (Rich, 2012).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…It is cumulative and evolving knowledge, based on experience. It privileges the community to validate it over many generations based on using the knowledge (Ogunniyi, 2013), together with aspects of spirituality and philosophy (Rich, 2012). This all-encompassing definition of IK presents both ontological and epistemological propositions about its nature.…”
Section: Epistemological Differences Between Ik and Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2011 ; Mack et al. , 2012 ; Rich, 2012 ; Acton et al. , 2017 ; Fonua, 2018 ; Zidny and Eilks, 2018 ; Zidny et al.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Thus, TEK is being increasingly sought after by academics, scientists, and policy makers as the inherent value it possesses in the fields of ecosystem management, conservation biology, climate change, wildlife sustainability, and ecological restoration is recognized ( Kimmerer, 2002 ; Schmidt and Stricker, 2010 ; Kidman et al. , 2011 ; Rich, 2012 ; Nalau et al. , 2018 ; Robinson et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%