The Routledge Handbook of Critical Pedagogies for Social Work 2020
DOI: 10.4324/9781351002042-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We align with Brookfield’s critical pedagogy which is located in the tradition of critical social theory. This approach demonstrates the clear connections between critical theorizing, analysis and critical reflection in teaching and learning which emphasizes human agency and underpins actions for social change ( Brookfield, 2005 ; see Morley, 2020 ).…”
Section: A Critical Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We align with Brookfield’s critical pedagogy which is located in the tradition of critical social theory. This approach demonstrates the clear connections between critical theorizing, analysis and critical reflection in teaching and learning which emphasizes human agency and underpins actions for social change ( Brookfield, 2005 ; see Morley, 2020 ).…”
Section: A Critical Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turning now to the educational context, the changing teaching and learning environment has led to a call to reinvigorate critical pedagogy (with its deep roots in critical theory) ‘to counter the subordination of social work education and practice to market demands and public austerity’ ( Morley et al ., 2020 , p. 1). As community development educators, we have rich, critical pedagogical traditions to draw on in shaping teaching and learning practices.…”
Section: A ‘Perfect Storm’: 21st Century Social Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the tradition of critical reflexivity that is central to our discipline (Morley, 2016, 2020), when social work looks back over many years of social justice research and education, we have many things to be proud of, but we also can identify instances where we failed to embrace a sufficiently critical and in-depth analysis and, unintentionally, ended up standing on the wrong side of history. Ioakimidis and Trimikliniotis (2020) argue that the prevailing approach in social work history is to ignore the profession’s “complicity, or at least acquiescence, in acts of state violence and institutionalised oppression” (p. 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, there have always been social workers who advocated for service users and policy change from within the system and outside of it (Kennedy-Kish et al, 2017). There have also been those who quietly or openly bent rules in the organizations in which they were employed and sometimes openly confronting oppressive situation and “flying under the radar” of injurious and exclusionary regulations in order to defend the dignity and entitlements of service users and the larger community (Davies, 2017; Morley, 2020). There have also been many, like the many social workers we currently see involved in Black Lives Matter protests worldwide, who are prepared to undertake ongoing activism to challenge taken-for-granted injustices and inequities and push policy makers and elected officials beyond their comfort zones to new social justice-engaged practices and policies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%