Sociétés Urbaines Et Déchets 2015
DOI: 10.4000/books.pufr.7297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction. Vivre des déchets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the WIMP was produced non-thermally in the early Universe (for example, from the decay of a heavier particle), it can naturally have a large annihilation crosssection [40,[61][62][63]. However, even if the WIMP was in thermal equilibrium in the early Universe, several mechanisms allow the cross-section to be large today while being much smaller at freeze-out [14][15][16][64][65][66][67][68]. The Sommerfeld enhancement [14][15][16][65][66][67][68] increases the crosssection at low dark matter velocities, v, so that the crosssection can be much larger today in the Milky-Way halo, where v ∼ 10 −3 , than during freeze-out, where v ∼ 0.3.…”
Section: Constraining Sommerfeld Enhanced Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the WIMP was produced non-thermally in the early Universe (for example, from the decay of a heavier particle), it can naturally have a large annihilation crosssection [40,[61][62][63]. However, even if the WIMP was in thermal equilibrium in the early Universe, several mechanisms allow the cross-section to be large today while being much smaller at freeze-out [14][15][16][64][65][66][67][68]. The Sommerfeld enhancement [14][15][16][65][66][67][68] increases the crosssection at low dark matter velocities, v, so that the crosssection can be much larger today in the Milky-Way halo, where v ∼ 10 −3 , than during freeze-out, where v ∼ 0.3.…”
Section: Constraining Sommerfeld Enhanced Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraints on dark matter annihilation to charged leptons are particularly relevant in light of the positron results from the PAMELA satellite in the energy range of 10-100 GeV [9] as well as the Fermi [10] and HESS [11,12] e + + e − spectra at ∼ 0.3 − 1 TeV. If dark matter annihilation is responsible for these measurements, the annihilation cross-section must be O(100 − 1000) times larger than the thermal freeze-out cross-section and only a small number of anti-protons can be created in the annihilation process [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Given the importance of the dark matter interpretation of these measurements, and the fact that more precise e + /e − flux measurements may not conclusively determine their origin (given the uncertainty in the e + /e − propagation in the Galaxy and in their background fluxes), independent checks of the dark matter interpretation of the PAMELA, Fermi, and HESS signals are of the utmost importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible for these excesses to be explained by conventional astrophysical objects such as nearby pulsars [10,11,12,13,14]. It is also possible that they may be the first indirect evidence of dark matter annihilations (e.g., [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]) or decays (e.g., [41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of the latter possibility, it has been shown that both PAMELA and ATIC/PPB-BETS, as well as a possible excess in microwave photons at the Galactic center dubbed the WMAP haze [52,53,54,55], may be explained by a ∼ 1 TeV dark matter particle which annihilates into charged leptons [15,16]. However, for this scenario to work, the annihilation cross-section in the Galactic halo must be boosted by factors of O(100) beyond the freeze-out cross-section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation