2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32199-3_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to the Work of M. Kakde on the Non-commutative Main Conjectures for Totally Real Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We briefly discuss some of the obstacles to generalising the approach of this article to prove higher dimension cases of the EIMC when a suitable µ = 0 hypothesis is not known. A serious obstacle is that a certain 'M H (G)-conjecture' is required to even formulate the higher dimension version of the EIMC, and that this is presently only known to hold under a suitable µ = 0 hypothesis (see [CK13,p. 5] and [CS12]).…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We briefly discuss some of the obstacles to generalising the approach of this article to prove higher dimension cases of the EIMC when a suitable µ = 0 hypothesis is not known. A serious obstacle is that a certain 'M H (G)-conjecture' is required to even formulate the higher dimension version of the EIMC, and that this is presently only known to hold under a suitable µ = 0 hypothesis (see [CK13,p. 5] and [CS12]).…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We formulate the K-theoretic main conjecture (in analogy with the classical case [4]) as follows (we use the notation from Section 4).…”
Section: Relation To Algebraic K-theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The further reduction steps of previous approaches do not generalise easily as they rely on the µ = 0 hypothesis in a crucial way and hence presently there is no apparent way to deduce the EIMC for all admissible one-dimensional extensions without this hypothesis. Moreover, a serious obstacle to the case of admissible extensions of dimension greater than one is that in general a certain 'M H (G)-conjecture' is required to even formulate the EIMC in this situation, and that this is presently only known to hold under the µ = 0 hypothesis (see [CK13,p. 5] and [CS12]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%