Introduction to the Special Issue on Open Science Practices: Badges of Honor

Rouse, Steven V.

doi:10.24839/2325-7342.jn23.2.94

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 97 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The reformation movement in psychology, part of the broader Open Science movement, is focused on mitigating these issues. Special issues presenting solutions to these problems for psychology, both as a whole and within specific sub-fields, have proliferated (e.g., Asarnow et al, 2018;Kappenman & Keil, 2017;Rouse, 2018). Here, we focus on one part of this reformation: researcher degrees of freedom.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Researcher Degrees of Freedom in the Psychology of Religion

Charles

Bartlett

Messick

et al. 2019

The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is a push in psychology toward more transparent practices, stemming partially as a response to the replication crisis. We argue that the psychology of religion should help lead the way toward these new, more transparent practices to ensure a robust and dynamic subfield. One of the major issues that proponents of Open Science practices hope to address is researcher degrees of freedom (RDF). We pre-registered and conducted a systematic review of the 2017 issues from three psychology of religion journals. We aimed to identify the extent to which the psychology of religion has embraced Open Science practices and the role of RDF within the subfield. We found that many of the methodologies that help to increase transparency, such as pre-registration, have yet to be adopted by those in the subfield. In light of these findings, we present recommendations for addressing the issue of transparency in the psychology of religion and outline how to move toward these new Open Science practices.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Researcher Degrees of Freedom in the Psychology of Religion

Charles

Bartlett

Messick

et al. 2019

The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Noba Project, for example, includes a reading on "The Replication Crisis in Psychology" (Diener & Biswas-Diener, 2015) and materials for a 1-hr lecture on the topic have also been made available (Chopik, Bremner, Defever, & Keller, 2018). Eye on Psi Chi published a synopsis of current reform efforts (Chartier, Lewis, & McCarthy, 2018), and the Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research has published pieces reviewing the replication crisis and describing the way the journal has adopted and adapted the Open Science badge system for articles published in the journal (Rouse, 2017(Rouse, , 2018.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Learning from mistakes: Teaching students about errata, corrigenda, and nonretraction corrections to the research literature.

Haas¹,

Rouse²

2022

Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Publication guidelines indicate that when substantive errors in research are noted after the publication of a research report, a correction (also known as an erratum or corrigendum) should be issued. Although such corrections are published with some regularity in psychology and in other scientific fields, the issue of corrections to the scientific literature is seldom addressed in the kinds of research methods textbooks often used in undergraduate psychology courses. This article briefly reviews the existing literature on the frequency and effectiveness of scientific correction generally and extends that literature to the domain of psychology specifically, with an emphasis on what undergraduate students should know.

show abstract

Introduction to the Special Issue on Open Science Practices: Badges of Honor

Cited by 2 publications

References 97 publications

Researcher Degrees of Freedom in the Psychology of Religion

Researcher Degrees of Freedom in the Psychology of Religion

Learning from mistakes: Teaching students about errata, corrigenda, and nonretraction corrections to the research literature.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About