2014
DOI: 10.3109/00952990.2014.949728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to the Special Issue on College Drinking Games

Abstract: Drinking games are high-risk, social drinking activities comprised of rules that promote participants' intoxication and determine when and how much alcohol should be consumed. Despite the negative consequences associated with drinking games, this high-risk activity is common among college students, with participation rates reported at nearly 50% in some studies. Empirical research examining drinking games participation in college student populations has increased (i.e. over 40 peer-reviewed articles were publi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drinking games (DGs) are high-risk, social drinking activities that have rules designed to facilitate intoxication and involve performing some cognitive and/or motor task (Zamboanga et al, 2014). DGs are especially high-risk because, unlike other drinking activities (e.g., prepartying), DGs involve rules designed to facilitate inebriation (Zamboanga & Tomaso, 2014); these rules can be enforced by gaming participants who may specifically target certain players for intoxication (Borsari, 2004; Zamboanga et al, 2015). Moreover, it has been suggested that DGs are a male-dominated drinking activity (Pedersen & LaBrie, 2008); however, research has not yet examined the role of gender-relevant factors in DGs participation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drinking games (DGs) are high-risk, social drinking activities that have rules designed to facilitate intoxication and involve performing some cognitive and/or motor task (Zamboanga et al, 2014). DGs are especially high-risk because, unlike other drinking activities (e.g., prepartying), DGs involve rules designed to facilitate inebriation (Zamboanga & Tomaso, 2014); these rules can be enforced by gaming participants who may specifically target certain players for intoxication (Borsari, 2004; Zamboanga et al, 2015). Moreover, it has been suggested that DGs are a male-dominated drinking activity (Pedersen & LaBrie, 2008); however, research has not yet examined the role of gender-relevant factors in DGs participation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the high-risk nature of drinking games, it is hardly surprising that scholarly attention to this activity has continued to increase in the United States (see Zamboanga & Tomaso, 2014, and Zamboanga, Olthuis, et al, 2014, for reviews) and elsewhere (e.g., Australia: Polizzotto et al, 2007; Mulligan, George, & Brown, 2016; Murugiah & Scott, 2014; United Kingdom: Moss et al, 2015). In addition, the link between acculturation and general alcohol use has garnered attention from researchers over the past several years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These rules are what make participation in drinking games particularly risky. Indeed, given this activity’s social nature, the rules have the potential to make players feel obligated to follow them, even at the cost of consuming heavy amounts of alcohol (Zamboanga & Tomaso, 2014). Moreover, in some games, certain players may use the rules to target another participant to become especially intoxicated (cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DGs are social drinking activities designed to promote intoxication, have rules specifying when and how much players drink, and involve doing some kind of cognitive and/or motor gaming tasks (Zamboanga et al, 2013a). Compared to other high-risk drinking behaviors, like prepartying (i.e., drinking before going out to a social event or gathering; Borsari et al, 2007) and 21 st birthday celebrations (Neighbors et al, 2014), DGs are a unique high-risk activity because they are comprised of rules expressly designed to encourage drunkenness (Zamboanga & Tomaso, 2014). Participants may in turn use these rules to target specific players for their increased intoxication (Borsari, 2004; Zamboanga et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%