2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-024-2134-7_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to the Social, Cultural, and Political Discourses of Autism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, DP is relatively underused within HRD, and thus in this paper we present a discussion of DP as a generative methodology for theory development in HRD. Given our substantive work has centered on the study of health and wellbeing, and how disability and ableism are made visible in conversational practices (Lester & O’Reilly, 2021; O’Reilly & Lester, 2017), we locate our discussion of DP in this context. Yet, in doing so, we do not intend to suggest that health and wellbeing are the only or even primary topics that one might explore when using DP; as indeed there is a well-established, interdisciplinary body of scholarship that points to a range of relevant topics to organizations and HRD (e.g., Potter & Hepburn, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, DP is relatively underused within HRD, and thus in this paper we present a discussion of DP as a generative methodology for theory development in HRD. Given our substantive work has centered on the study of health and wellbeing, and how disability and ableism are made visible in conversational practices (Lester & O’Reilly, 2021; O’Reilly & Lester, 2017), we locate our discussion of DP in this context. Yet, in doing so, we do not intend to suggest that health and wellbeing are the only or even primary topics that one might explore when using DP; as indeed there is a well-established, interdisciplinary body of scholarship that points to a range of relevant topics to organizations and HRD (e.g., Potter & Hepburn, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%