2019
DOI: 10.28968/cftt.v5i1.31998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to Special Section on Crip Technoscience

Abstract: This special section of Catalyst maps the central nodes of the emerging field of crip technoscience, which we situate at the intersection of feminist technoscience studies and critical disability studies. Crip technoscience marks areas of overlap between these fields as well as productive disciplinary and political tensions. Our section brings together critical perspectives on disability and science and technology in order to grapple with historical and contemporary debates related to digital and emerging tech… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Attending to practices of making movement available enables such critical relations to access, while opening the question of how access already interprets infrastructure. It thus allows us to work in an analytical space in which bodies are not essentially bounded or to be rehabilitated to normative practice (Shildrick 2015), and in which technology and design could be otherwise (Fritsch et al 2019), while following the critical tensions which animate accessibility work.…”
Section: Discussion: Making Movement Availablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attending to practices of making movement available enables such critical relations to access, while opening the question of how access already interprets infrastructure. It thus allows us to work in an analytical space in which bodies are not essentially bounded or to be rehabilitated to normative practice (Shildrick 2015), and in which technology and design could be otherwise (Fritsch et al 2019), while following the critical tensions which animate accessibility work.…”
Section: Discussion: Making Movement Availablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Design Journal 2019). Such critique echoes arguments from within crip technoscience (Fritsch et al 2019), advocating expertise or even design initiation to be shifted from designers to those with lived experience, to minimize likelihood of designs being rejected by the disability community (Shew 2018). In this case, utilizing a child-centred design approach would ensure children's individual and collective voices, perspectives, priorities and lived experiences of IPM are captured and considered as a core part of the design process.…”
Section: A Framework For Transitioning Designerly Waysmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Contemporary narratives put forward by Critical Disability Studies and Crip Theory around empowerment, techno-ableism, crip technoscience and design justice could help critique, alter, and reinvent the material-discursive world (Fritsch et al 2019;Shew 2018;Costanza-Chock 2020). However, engagement with alternative narratives, social imaginaries, and approaches to framing IPM have remained underexplored and relatively unchanged.…”
Section: Reflecting On and Questioning Designerly Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dans la composition du numéro spécial qui fonde en quelque sorte le courant, les autrices reconnaissent que le courant est en émergence et que plusieurs des titres qui y sont associés n'ont pas abordé les CT en tant que tels, mais qu'ils ont des questions relatives au CT comme points de convergence. Voir Fritsch, K., Hamraie, A., Mills, M., & Serlin, D. (2019). Introduction to Special Section on Crip Technoscience.…”
Section: Le Modèle Socialunclassified