2007
DOI: 10.1029/2007wr006332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to special section on Modeling of Pore‐Scale Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the use of void network models in relating water retention curves to void sizes and hydraulic conductivities, van Dijke and Piri [2007] comment that the goals have changed little in the last 60 years. A particular problem with applying such models to soil is the simplicity of a network of, for example, pores connected by cylindrical “throats” relative to the extreme complexity of the structure of soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the use of void network models in relating water retention curves to void sizes and hydraulic conductivities, van Dijke and Piri [2007] comment that the goals have changed little in the last 60 years. A particular problem with applying such models to soil is the simplicity of a network of, for example, pores connected by cylindrical “throats” relative to the extreme complexity of the structure of soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early numerical modeling of pore-scale flows tended to address the cumulative Stoke's drag on periodic arrays of idealized obstacles (viz. permeability of arrays [3]), and only recently advances in computational technology and in visualization of actual pore spaces have enabled progress with pore-scale simulation of percolating flows [4]. While the leading trend still is to simulate pore-scale transport with heavily reduced fluid equations, the harbingers of Navier-Stokes DNS [5][6][7] have already demonstrated the potential of virtual experiments for complementing laboratory studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation can be explained by the higher proportion of glass beads (water-wet surfaces) compared to acrylic beads (oil-wet surfaces), given that water will remain trapped in the pendular rings around the water-wet grain contacts. Interesting analogies from natural systems can be found in Tiab and Donaldson (2004), Sahimi (1995) and Kumar et al (2008), whereby water blobs formed from the presaturation of brine, as the small water-wet pores are spontaneously imbibed by water due to capillary suction. Figure 4 shows the cumulative volume percent of each oil blob group to the total residual oil trapped in the pore space and each water blob group to the total residual water trapped in the pore space.…”
Section: Fluid Phase Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that less oil was recovered after a water injection as the system became more oil-wet. Moreover, according to Morrow Norman and Geoffrey (2001) an infinite number of possible wetting states exist between the strongly waterwet and the strongly oil-wet, and similarly there are many varied flow behaviors Tiab and Donaldson (2004). Understanding the effect of wettability on fluid recovery requires information pertaining to pore-scale fluid distribution, wetting preferences, and pore geometry Kumar (2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation