1992
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-58106-9_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to shape optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
420
0
6

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 362 publications
(427 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
420
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…It stays close to the classical optimization problems and gives sufficient optimality conditions of first order, while in [7,8,19] only second order optimality conditions are stated which require more regularity of the data and regularity of the perturbation of domains. We provide a dynamic programming approach to structural optimization problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It stays close to the classical optimization problems and gives sufficient optimality conditions of first order, while in [7,8,19] only second order optimality conditions are stated which require more regularity of the data and regularity of the perturbation of domains. We provide a dynamic programming approach to structural optimization problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Following Zolésio [19], for a given Φ(v), we introduce the field (again v is a parameter, not a variable)…”
Section: Reduction Of Shape Optimization Problem To a Classical Contrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The variational formulation of the system (1.3-1.8) corresponds to the following system of variational inequality and equation [5]: 14) where K t is the constraint set defined by the obstacle 15) and H 1 0 (Ω t ), H 2 0 (Ω t ) are the usual Sobolev spaces defined by…”
Section: Formulation Of the Nonlinear Obstacle Plate Problem In ω Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 is majorated by a constant independent of s. In fact, from the definition of G φ2(s) (φ 1 (s)) we obtain, for each s, 15) and choosing v φ2(s) = G φ2(s) (φ 1 (s)), using the ellipticity of B φ2(s) , the continuity of b φ2(s) and the relations between the norms of the spaces [ …”
Section: Proposition 34 If Supp µ Is Admissible Then the Set K Is mentioning
confidence: 99%