Sensory Evaluation Practices 1985
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-672480-6.50005-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to Sensory Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
84
0
14

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
84
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensory evaluation. Descriptors to evaluate roasted hazelnuts were generated using data shown in literature and sensory analysis was carried out in collaboration with the research group of the O.N.A.Frut (Fruit Taster National Organization) tasters, specifically trained on roasted hazelnuts (Mellano 2008), after defining a specific protocol on the basis of literature (Stone & Sidel 1985;Meilgaard et al 1987;Porretta 1992;Kader 2008). After each sample, the tasters restored their initial tasting conditions by drinking mineral water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensory evaluation. Descriptors to evaluate roasted hazelnuts were generated using data shown in literature and sensory analysis was carried out in collaboration with the research group of the O.N.A.Frut (Fruit Taster National Organization) tasters, specifically trained on roasted hazelnuts (Mellano 2008), after defining a specific protocol on the basis of literature (Stone & Sidel 1985;Meilgaard et al 1987;Porretta 1992;Kader 2008). After each sample, the tasters restored their initial tasting conditions by drinking mineral water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects were given a small portion (one-third of the original test meal), in random order at 15 min intervals. This time they were asked to rate each food using a standard smiley chart containing hedonic phrases (Stone and Sidel, 1985). Volunteers were given water together with each food and to rinse out their mouths between each food tested.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This panel was selected by the ability to detect and accurately quantify, in a non structured scale, 17 the aroma in samples with distinct extruded rumen concentration. Examiners that showed p sample ≤0.30, p repetition ≥0.05 and coherence with the group were selected.…”
Section: Extraction Of Volatile Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examiners that showed p sample ≤0.30, p repetition ≥0.05 and coherence with the group were selected. 17 …”
Section: Extraction Of Volatile Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%