2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-04293-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to Process Algebra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
166
0
15

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 162 publications
0
166
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…In [7], we show that the processes considered in BTA+REC can be viewed as processes that are definable over ACP [14].…”
Section: Basic Thread Algebramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [7], we show that the processes considered in BTA+REC can be viewed as processes that are definable over ACP [14].…”
Section: Basic Thread Algebramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason to use basic thread algebra is that it has been designed as an algebra of processes that interact with machines of the kind to which also the execution architecture belongs. It is quite awkward to describe processes of that kind using a general process algebra such as ACP [14], CCS [21] or CSP [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interleaving of two sentences (x <%> y) can be defined conveniently in terms of left-interleave (denoted by x %> y, and also known as the left-merge operator [Bergstra and Klop, 1985]), which expresses that the first symbol should be taken from the left-hand side operand. The algebra of communicating processes field traditionally defines interleave in terms of left-interleave (and "communication interleave") to obtain a sound and complete axiomatisation [Fokkink, 2000].…”
Section: Interleavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[BW90,FokOO,Mil89]). Below we present the transition system for the basic process language with explicit termination c, deadlock {) (which has no rules)' a prefixing operation 'a. '…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%