2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-04400-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to Optimization Analysis in Hydrosystem Engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The front formed by the non-dominated individuals of the optimization in the multidimensional objective function space is called the pareto-optimal front. The elements of this front constitute the result of the optimization (see [15]).…”
Section: The Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The front formed by the non-dominated individuals of the optimization in the multidimensional objective function space is called the pareto-optimal front. The elements of this front constitute the result of the optimization (see [15]).…”
Section: The Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where p n is the number of poles, pw is the number of parallel wires, mag d is the diameter of the envelope of the magnets, and P2x is the inner radius of the stator minus the air gap. Constraint (15) specifies the minimum distance between the magnets and the rotor cuts, constraint (16) prevents the rotor and stator from crossing, constraint (17) specifies the minimum winding requirements, and constraint (18) ensures the correct shape of the magnets.…”
Section: The Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These relevant treatments lie on the "Pareto frontier" (optimal path). 142,143 In other words, a treatment with an equal or greater efficacy while simultaneously providing an equal or lesser cost dominates other treatments, whereas other therapies that would yield a lesser or equal performance while with equal or higher costs are considered inadmissible (Figure 8). Lastly, when the model was fit to log-scale data for capturing relative returns on membrane costs (using changes in log ridge width and height as the outcomes with log reference costs for the membrane), a diminishing return was observed for an additional dollar spent for a barrier membrane beyond approximately US$50 and gaining additional performance in ridge preservation (Figure 9).…”
Section: Cost-effectiveness Of Alveolar Ridge Preservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use Lingo tools [60], [61] to conduct a simulation study to evaluate the effectiveness of E2SP discussed in Sections III based on experiments. In the simulation setup, we consider a scenario with 10 energy consumers (i.e., m = 10) and 4 energy suppliers (i.e., n = 4) as shown in Table 3.…”
Section: A Evaluation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%