2019
DOI: 10.1002/jts5.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to intergroup contact and collective action: Integrative perspectives

Abstract: The bodies of research on intergroup contact and on collective action have historically remained separate in their pursuit to understand how to promote social equality. In recent years, however, researchers have begun to explore the extent to which contact and collective action work together or against each other in the pursuit of social change. To date, there is mixed evidence on the relation between these two constructs, with some suggesting that intergroup contact can have ironic effects by reducing the lik… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 72 publications
(111 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have considered intergroup contact as a possible predictor of collective action among advantaged and disadvantaged group members (Choma & McKeown, 2019; Hässler, Uluğ, et al, 2020). Among disadvantaged groups, intergroup contact is generally associated with lower collective action, presumably because of a decrease in their perceived injustice, inequality, and motivation to achieve social change (Cakal et al, 2011; Hässler, Ullrich, et al, 2020).…”
Section: Collective Action Toward the Disadvantagedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have considered intergroup contact as a possible predictor of collective action among advantaged and disadvantaged group members (Choma & McKeown, 2019; Hässler, Uluğ, et al, 2020). Among disadvantaged groups, intergroup contact is generally associated with lower collective action, presumably because of a decrease in their perceived injustice, inequality, and motivation to achieve social change (Cakal et al, 2011; Hässler, Ullrich, et al, 2020).…”
Section: Collective Action Toward the Disadvantagedmentioning
confidence: 99%