Flow Control
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-69672-5_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to Flow Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 295 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the origin of opposition control is somewhat uncertain [11], the first simulations demonstrating this method are those of [5] who used DNS at Re τ = 180 reporting about 20% drag reduction when the sensing plane is located at y + s = 10. The more recent DNS by [14] shows that, again for Re τ = 180, the optimal sensing plane location is y + s = 15 which gives about 25% drag reduction.…”
Section: Review Of Opposition Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the origin of opposition control is somewhat uncertain [11], the first simulations demonstrating this method are those of [5] who used DNS at Re τ = 180 reporting about 20% drag reduction when the sensing plane is located at y + s = 10. The more recent DNS by [14] shows that, again for Re τ = 180, the optimal sensing plane location is y + s = 15 which gives about 25% drag reduction.…”
Section: Review Of Opposition Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make the discussion concrete, we focus on one popular control strategy, opposition control, that has been extensively (and almost exclusively) studied using low Reynolds number DNS (Choi et al, 1994;Hammond et al, 1998). As such, the results presented here are not general in that they do not necessarily extend to other control strategies [see the review articles by (Gad-el-hak, 1998;Moin and Bewley, 1994;Lumley and Blossey, 1998) for discussions of other control strategies.] However, opposition control has been used both as a foundation upon which other (potentially more practical) control strategies are developed and as a reference against which other strategies are compared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before reviewing the three classes of materials above, it is useful to examine the physical requirements that pressure sensors must meet to solve modern technological challenges. To our knowledge, the most stringent conditions are set by the need to image turbulent flow . Currently, the best pressure and shear stress sensors are micromachined in‐silico.…”
Section: Flexible Electronicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have dimensions of 100 microns and sensitivity of 50–500 kPa, which is inadequate . Imaging turbulence in the air boundary layer of an aircraft is an outstanding challenge, which calls for sensor arrays sampling pressure changes at a rate of 1 kHz, with sensitivity of at least 1 kPa, and spatial resolution better than 26 μm.…”
Section: Flexible Electronicsmentioning
confidence: 99%