1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4052-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to Discrete Mathematics with ISETL

Abstract: Fenton, William (William E.) Introduction to discrete mathematics with ISETL I by William Fenton & Ed Dubinsky. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. -) and index.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example of work that is exploring relationships between combinatorics and computational thinking and activity in particular, some researchers have investigated ways in which combinatorial thinking may be well-suited for fostering computational thinking and activity, as well as how computational settings might reinforce and enrich students' reasoning about combinatorics problems (e.g., Fenton & Dubinsky, 1996;Lockwood & De Chenne, 2019;De Chenne & Lockwood, 2020;Lockwood, Valdes-Fernandez, & De Chenne, 2019). For instance, in their book Introduction to Discrete Mathematics with ISETL, Fenton and Dubinsky (1996) proposed a new programming language (ISETL) that would explicitly help to reinforce topics of discrete mathematics in a computational setting. As another example, Lockwood & De Chenne (2019) report on two students' exploration of tasks in which they solved counting problems in a computational setting of programming involving coding in Python.…”
Section: -Combinatorics Is a Natural Domain In Which To Examine (And Develop) Computational Thinking And Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example of work that is exploring relationships between combinatorics and computational thinking and activity in particular, some researchers have investigated ways in which combinatorial thinking may be well-suited for fostering computational thinking and activity, as well as how computational settings might reinforce and enrich students' reasoning about combinatorics problems (e.g., Fenton & Dubinsky, 1996;Lockwood & De Chenne, 2019;De Chenne & Lockwood, 2020;Lockwood, Valdes-Fernandez, & De Chenne, 2019). For instance, in their book Introduction to Discrete Mathematics with ISETL, Fenton and Dubinsky (1996) proposed a new programming language (ISETL) that would explicitly help to reinforce topics of discrete mathematics in a computational setting. As another example, Lockwood & De Chenne (2019) report on two students' exploration of tasks in which they solved counting problems in a computational setting of programming involving coding in Python.…”
Section: -Combinatorics Is a Natural Domain In Which To Examine (And Develop) Computational Thinking And Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Çünkü "func" yapısının ikinci kısmında incelenen özelliğe ait matematiksel tanım ya da ilişki yazılmaktadır. Diğer matematiksel kavramların programlanma sürecinde de geçerli olan bu durum öğrencilerin kavramları zihinlerinde yapılandırmalarında, en etkili yollardan biri olarak görülmektedir (Fenton & Dubinsky, 1996). Bu bağlamda bu çalışmada, APOS teorisinin önerdiği zihinsel yapıların oluşturulması sürecinde ACE döngüsü içinde yer alan ISETL aktivitelerinin etkililiği araştırılmıştır.…”
Section: Isetl Programlama Diliunclassified
“…Other works (Siller and Greefrath, 2009) share with us a focus on mathematical modelling but most of them use software tools as Computer Algebra systems (CAS), Dynamic Geometry Software (DGS) or Spredsheet programs (SP). Our approach is very closed from (Fenton and Dubinsky, 1996). We adopt their APO model of concept formation together with a computer-supported approach The main differences are (1) that we use a lightweight formal method while they use a programming language, (2) that our approach doesn't restrict to mathematics but is cross-disciplinary.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we will explain how Alloy allows a pedagogy based on the Action-Process-Object model (Fenton and Dubinsky, 1996) which is considered today as the central model of concept formation. According to this model, three successive mental constructions are needed in order to develop an understanding of a mathematical concept.…”
Section: A Constructivist Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation