2011
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139048910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to Compact Riemann Surfaces and Dessins d’Enfants

Abstract: Few books on the subject of Riemann surfaces cover the relatively modern theory of dessins d'enfants (children's drawings), which was launched by Grothendieck in the 1980s and is now an active field of research. In this 2011 book, the authors begin with an elementary account of the theory of compact Riemann surfaces viewed as algebraic curves and as quotients of the hyperbolic plane by the action of Fuchsian groups of finite type. They then use this knowledge to introduce the reader to the theory of dessins d'… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
173
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
173
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We refer the interested reader to [9] for further reading. We do not pursue here this "finite" side of the theory further, which is devoted to the study of FCov(M) of finite coverings of the modular orbifold, and we turn our attention to the study of some special infinite covers.…”
Section: Galois Action On Modular Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer the interested reader to [9] for further reading. We do not pursue here this "finite" side of the theory further, which is devoted to the study of FCov(M) of finite coverings of the modular orbifold, and we turn our attention to the study of some special infinite covers.…”
Section: Galois Action On Modular Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Grothendieck's dessins d'enfants [21,22] are the finite coverings of a sphere minus three points, so their parent group is its fundamental group Γ = F 2 , with generators X, Y and Z inducing the monodromy permutations at the three punctures.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is one of the (2, 3, 7) uniform Belyi functions (see Example 4.44 in [9]) and it is defined over M (K) = Q. However, in this model there are automorphisms not defined over Q, and therefore we cannot expect all uniform Belyi functions in K F to be defined over Q simultaneously.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%