Brain Stimulation 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118568323.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to Brain Stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unclear how STN-HFS triggers both acute suppression at stimulation onset, and suppression of SIB that persists beyond the stimulus, although longlasting neuronal plasticity is a key feature of all brain stimulation interventions (Baraban, 2015). Noting also that we found HFS restimulation to be effective, our data raise the possibility that if STN-DBS were used for ASD patients with intractable SIB, one could consider on-demand stimulation and real-time feedback to slow the development of tolerance if an electrophysiological signal for the stereotyped selfinjury could be identified (Reti and Chang, 2015). Habituation to the therapeutic effects of DBS has been described for both essential tremor and Parkinson's disease, the cause of which is unknown, but on-demand stimulation in response to local field potentials appears to lengthen the time DBS is effective and increase battery life (Kronenbuerger et al, 2006;Little et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is unclear how STN-HFS triggers both acute suppression at stimulation onset, and suppression of SIB that persists beyond the stimulus, although longlasting neuronal plasticity is a key feature of all brain stimulation interventions (Baraban, 2015). Noting also that we found HFS restimulation to be effective, our data raise the possibility that if STN-DBS were used for ASD patients with intractable SIB, one could consider on-demand stimulation and real-time feedback to slow the development of tolerance if an electrophysiological signal for the stereotyped selfinjury could be identified (Reti and Chang, 2015). Habituation to the therapeutic effects of DBS has been described for both essential tremor and Parkinson's disease, the cause of which is unknown, but on-demand stimulation in response to local field potentials appears to lengthen the time DBS is effective and increase battery life (Kronenbuerger et al, 2006;Little et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…However, focal brain stimulation engages neural elements that form part of distinct, parallel-organized, functional basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits (Reti and Chang, 2015). Accordingly, in future studies it will be important to evaluate the efficacy of HFS at other sites, including cortical regions that project to the STN and GPi such as the orbitofrontal cortex and supplementary motor area, which have also been implicated in mediating intractable SIB seen in ASD patients (Muehlmann and Lewis, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other ethical questions are more specific to the therapeutic goals of particular prosthetics and the conditions for which they are indicated. DBS can restore motor control in movement disorders (Benabid 2003, Krack et al 2010, Benabid and Torres 2012, Okun 2012, Reti 2015 and improve cognition, mood and motivation in psychiatric disorders (Mayberg et al 2005, Lozano et al 2008, Mallet et al 2008, Greenberg et al 2010, Holtzheimer and Mayberg 2011. But neurostimulation can also cause adverse effects, which requires careful weighing of potential benefits and risks of the technique (Frank et al 2007, Mallet et al 2008, Rabins et al 2009, Muller and Christen 2011, Christen et al 2012, Castrioto et al 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%