2018
DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2018.1497977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to 2018 special issue of European Security: “ontological (in)security in the European Union”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, interactionist role theory (IRT) and the ontological security literature (OSL) have fuelled a socio-psychological turn in the discipline of International Relations (IR) (see, for instance, Browning and Joenniemi, 2017; Harnisch, 2011b, 2012; Kinnvall, 2004; Kinnvall et al, 2018; Kinnvall and Mitzen, 2017; McCourt, 2011, 2012, 2014; Steele, 2008; Wehner, 2015; Wehner and Thies, 2014; Zarakol, 2010). While closely related, and largely complementary, the two literatures remain, however, surprisingly disconnected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, interactionist role theory (IRT) and the ontological security literature (OSL) have fuelled a socio-psychological turn in the discipline of International Relations (IR) (see, for instance, Browning and Joenniemi, 2017; Harnisch, 2011b, 2012; Kinnvall, 2004; Kinnvall et al, 2018; Kinnvall and Mitzen, 2017; McCourt, 2011, 2012, 2014; Steele, 2008; Wehner, 2015; Wehner and Thies, 2014; Zarakol, 2010). While closely related, and largely complementary, the two literatures remain, however, surprisingly disconnected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scholarship in ontological security has conceptualised crises and the anxiety around them as posing existential questions to the integrity of the Self (see Ejdus, 2020;Kinnvall, 2004;Steele, 2008, Mitzen, 2006a2006b;2018). Further although mostly by focusing on identity narratives by states and the impact of crises on them, the burgeoning field has since adapted its approach to many different collectives, including the EU (Kinnvall, Manners & Mitzen, 2018). While narratives and crises are central to the literature on ontological security, it has yet to link it to the study of strategic narratives, which is the theoretical innovation I suggest here.…”
Section: Ontological Security Identity Narratives and Agencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinnvall, Manners ve Mitzen, Avrupa'da sömürge döneminden kalma ontolojik güven(siz)liklerin popülist siyaset için zemin hazırladığını vurgular. 76 Rumelili ve Subotić, makalelerinde, Avrupa'daki ontolojik güvensizlik durumunu, AB bütünleşme sürecinde kullanılan egemen anlatılar ile hala dönüşüm süreci içerisinde olan üye ülkelerin öz-anlatıları arasındaki çelişki ile açıklamışlardır. 77 Alkopher ve Sala'ya göre 2015 göçmen kriziyle zirveye çıkan bu popülist söylemler aslında AB ülkelerinin kendi ulusal öz-anlatıları, ontolojik güvenlik rutinleri ve göçmen politikaları ile paralellik göstermektedir.…”
Section: Ontolojik Güvenlik çAlışmalarının Araştırma Konularıunclassified