Twenty-First Century Populism 2008
DOI: 10.1057/9780230592100_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: The Sceptre and the Spectre

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
98
0
11

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
98
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as noted above, what is missing in such cases is a distinct focus on 'the people' versus their enemies (step 3), as well as an active attempt to continue propagating the crisis (step 6). The fact that populist performances of crisis and other modes of 'crisis politics' in contemporary democracies share a number of commonalities should not come as a surprise, given that many authors have noted the interrelated nature of populism and democracy, with populism being viewed as an 'internal periphery' (Arditi 2007), 'mirror' (Panizza 2005) or 'spectre' (Albertazzi and McDonnell 2008) of democracy. Similarly, a number of authors (Mazzoleni 2008;Mondon 2013;Snow and Moffitt 2012) have noted the ways that populism is becoming increasingly 'mainstreamed' in contemporary democratic politics, indicating that populist and more 'mainstream' forms of politics can have much in common.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as noted above, what is missing in such cases is a distinct focus on 'the people' versus their enemies (step 3), as well as an active attempt to continue propagating the crisis (step 6). The fact that populist performances of crisis and other modes of 'crisis politics' in contemporary democracies share a number of commonalities should not come as a surprise, given that many authors have noted the interrelated nature of populism and democracy, with populism being viewed as an 'internal periphery' (Arditi 2007), 'mirror' (Panizza 2005) or 'spectre' (Albertazzi and McDonnell 2008) of democracy. Similarly, a number of authors (Mazzoleni 2008;Mondon 2013;Snow and Moffitt 2012) have noted the ways that populism is becoming increasingly 'mainstreamed' in contemporary democratic politics, indicating that populist and more 'mainstream' forms of politics can have much in common.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main literature agrees, however, on two important elements. The first claims that the government should act according to the will of the people (Albertazzi and McDonnell, 2008;Jagers and Walgrave, 2007;Mudde, 2004Mudde, , 2007Taggart, 2000). This "people", as Taggart (2000) stresses, is not the entire national population, but rather a section of the population, regarded as "virtuous" and pure.…”
Section: Right-wing Populism: What Do We Mean?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Michael Freeden (1996) suggested that there are some ideologies which can be combined with other main ideologies. Populism, as the literature shows, is one example of those (Albertazzi and McDonnell, 2008;Jagers and Walgrave, 2007;Lucardie and Voerman, 2012;Mudde, 2004;Stanley, 2008;Taggart, 2000). One must always take into consideration populism's positioning on the right-left spectrum (Huber and Schimpf, 2017;Otjes and Louwerse, 2015, p 63).…”
Section: Right-wing Populism: What Do We Mean?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars define populism as a set of ideas in which the good people are pitted against the evil elite ( Albertazzi & McDonnell, 2008;Canovan, 2004;Mudde, 2004;Stanley, 2008). Mudde (2004, p. 543) describes populism as 'an ideology that considers society to be ultimately separated into two homogeneous and antagonistic groups, 'the pure people' versus 'the corrupt elite', and which argues that politics should be an expression of the volonté générale (general will) of the people'.…”
Section: Populism and Political Cynicismmentioning
confidence: 99%