2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: The geologic mapping of Vesta

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThe purpose of this paper is to introduce the Geologic Mapping of Vesta Special Issue/Section of Icarus, which includes several papers containing geologic maps of the surface of Vesta made to support data analysis conducted by the Dawn Science Team during the Vesta Encounter (July 2011-September 2012. In this paper we briefly discuss pre-Dawn knowledge of Vesta, provide the goals of our geologic mapping campaign, discuss the methodologies and materials used for geologic mapping, review the glob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(98 reference statements)
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detailed discussion of the basemap and supplemental materials used to make the quadrangle maps of Vesta, as well as the techniques and tools used, is given in the introductory paper (Williams et al, 2014). Briefly, we conducted iterative mapping of the Av-8 Marcia quadrangle using successively higher spatial resolution Framing Camera image mosaics obtained during the Survey ($260 m/pixel), High Altitude Mapping Orbit (HAMO, $70 m/pixel), and LAMO ($25 m/pixel, Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed discussion of the basemap and supplemental materials used to make the quadrangle maps of Vesta, as well as the techniques and tools used, is given in the introductory paper (Williams et al, 2014). Briefly, we conducted iterative mapping of the Av-8 Marcia quadrangle using successively higher spatial resolution Framing Camera image mosaics obtained during the Survey ($260 m/pixel), High Altitude Mapping Orbit (HAMO, $70 m/pixel), and LAMO ($25 m/pixel, Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chronology function is calculated using a vestan impact probability of Main Belt asteroids and the lunar chronology (Schmedemann et al, in preparation). This method, similar to the chronologies for Mars (e.g., Ivanov, 2001;Hartmann and Neukum, 2001), is briefly reviewed in Williams et al (2014a). The lunar chronology itself relies on radiometrically dated samples and crater counts on the lunar surface (e.g., Stöffler and Ryder, 2001;Neukum et al, 2001;Hiesinger et al, 2012).…”
Section: Datasets and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lunar chronology itself relies on radiometrically dated samples and crater counts on the lunar surface (e.g., Stöffler and Ryder, 2001;Neukum et al, 2001;Hiesinger et al, 2012). We have chosen to use these functions rather than the alternative Vesta chronology of O'Brien (in preparation) and production function used by Marchi et al (2012), and discussed in Williams et al (2014a). The reason for this choice is that the chronology and production functions of Schmedemann et al (in preparation) are based on lunar observations (CSFD and lunar samples) scaled to the Vesta conditions, in contrast to a chronology based on Main Belt dynamics (O'Brien, in preparation) and a production function based on a model of the size-frequency distribution of Main Belt objects (Marchi et al, 2012).…”
Section: Datasets and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The map was prodeced from data about spectral reflectivity of the surface, collected by Dawn Mission. The most ancient and heavily cratered regions are brown; areas modified by the Veneneia and Rheasilvia impacts are purple (the Saturnalia Fossae Formation, in the North) and light cyan (the Divalia Fossae Formation, equatorial), respectively; the Rheasilvia impact basin interior (in the South) is dark blue, and neighboring areas of Rheasilvia ejecta (including an area within Veneneia) are light purple-blue; areas modified by more recent impacts or mass wasting are yellow/orange or green, respectively (Williams et al 2014).…”
Section: Figure 11mentioning
confidence: 99%