2003
DOI: 10.1080/02666286.2003.10406219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: The authority of likeness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus when ancient Greek philosophers acknowledged the benefits of the mirror as a surface that reflected the community's collective and corrective gaze (Bartsch 2006; Melchoir-Bonnet 2001), when late Medieval and Renaissance identity found expression through a coat of arms, gendered norms, and physiognomic signs (Berger 1994; Perkinson 2009; Randolph 2003; Simons 1988; 1995) and when John Belot wove the face into the threads of the cosmos and the movement of the stars (Magli 1989, 111), they were producing a face that could only be rendered legible when tethered to a preexisting order that both preceded and enveloped man. The face was both produced by a historically situated viewer at the same time as it framed the cultural expectations of what is a face.…”
Section: Producing the Facementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus when ancient Greek philosophers acknowledged the benefits of the mirror as a surface that reflected the community's collective and corrective gaze (Bartsch 2006; Melchoir-Bonnet 2001), when late Medieval and Renaissance identity found expression through a coat of arms, gendered norms, and physiognomic signs (Berger 1994; Perkinson 2009; Randolph 2003; Simons 1988; 1995) and when John Belot wove the face into the threads of the cosmos and the movement of the stars (Magli 1989, 111), they were producing a face that could only be rendered legible when tethered to a preexisting order that both preceded and enveloped man. The face was both produced by a historically situated viewer at the same time as it framed the cultural expectations of what is a face.…”
Section: Producing the Facementioning
confidence: 99%