2006
DOI: 10.5172/hesr.2006.15.5.421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: taking stock of medical dominance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature on professions around issues of monopoly, power and boundaries has been preoccupied with the potential loss of doctors' hegemony due to tasks that are now being performed by lower level of health professionals such as nurses, pharmacists and other 'allied health workers' (Willis 2006;Boyce 2006;Cooper 2012) as is the case in most developed countries. However, it paid little (if any) consideration to such issues in the context of 'laymanisation' and its potential impact on nurses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on professions around issues of monopoly, power and boundaries has been preoccupied with the potential loss of doctors' hegemony due to tasks that are now being performed by lower level of health professionals such as nurses, pharmacists and other 'allied health workers' (Willis 2006;Boyce 2006;Cooper 2012) as is the case in most developed countries. However, it paid little (if any) consideration to such issues in the context of 'laymanisation' and its potential impact on nurses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…specialized knowledge (social closure), the co-option of elements from other professional domains, and the marketing to and acceptance of professional authority by the layperson that is often backed by government legislation and funding. 10,[12][13][14][15] There is continuing debate about whether the neoliberal economic reforms of the past few decades have significantly weakened biomedical dominance. 10,13,14 Certainly, the freer capitalistic market has coincided with a rise in patient demand for TCAM, legislative changes legitimizing TCAM, insurance funding for TCAM, and changes in consumer expectations and behavior.…”
Section: Biomedical Dominancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Used coercively it may lead to unfair treatment, discrimination and 'oppressive consequences' (ibid p16), which is where dismissing Jim as a 'troublemaker' might have led. Perhaps remembering the medical dominance prevalent in his youth (Willis 2006), which sees the disease rather than the person, Jim felt a need to exert his power and assertiveness in pursuit of his own goals.…”
Section: Jim's Challenges: Power Vulnerability and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%