This essay takes up an apparently minor idea of Susan Moller Okin's Justice, Gender, and the Family-that employers should split the paycheck of wage-earning husbands between employees and their stay-at-home spouses-and suggests that it actually threatens to undermine Okin's entire argument by perpetuating the most central cause of women's inequality by Okin's own account: the sexual division of labor. Recognizing the vital contributions that Okin's seminal work made and the impact that it had on the field of feminist philosophy and political theory, the essay explores the ethical, political, and philosophical problems with this solution to the dire problems of gender inequality and injustice that Okin correctly identifies. The essay suggests that her commitment to liberalism may have resulted in a commitment to an inadequate vision of how to solve the problems of gender inequality, and offers other possibilities that Okin could have pursued instead that sustain her strong commitment to liberalism.Justice, Gender, and the Family (JGF) is a strong, clear, and forceful treatise for greater gender justice and equality in the family. Just as Susan Okin showed in Women in Western Political Thought the ways in which political theory in general took gendered inequality in the family as a bedrock assumption and foundation for its construal of politics, in JGF she shows that contemporary political theories of justice in particular take for granted-and may even (inadvertently) take as natural and good-a structure of gendered inequality that privileges men's at the expense of women's, and often children's, welfare, freedom, citizenship, and humanity. Her critiques of leading figures such as Michael Walzer, Alistair MacIntyre, and John Rawls are thorough and thoroughgoing, rigorous and forceful. She raises significant issues about the ways in which society is structured by and around gender inequality, and how the family is instrumental in fostering and furthering that inequality. She makes a powerful case for a better and more equal world.My focus, however, is on a seemingly micro point that I believe has macro implications: the split-paycheck proposal. Okin suggests that in families where the sexual