2002
DOI: 10.1080/09681220208567326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Ritual music and Communism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Soviet Union, folk music and folklore were important parts of the state program to highlight socialist national identities as symbolic markers of nationhood: "Folklore in the Soviet Union has been used consciously for propagating the cultural construction and political education of the masses for one goal -the realization of socialism and communism" (Oinas 1975). Backed up by the propaganda project launched by Lenin, traditional music was appropriated, reworked, and redeployed for propaganda purposes as "new wine in old bottles" (Harris and Norton 2002). This section reveals how music played a role in the process of folklorization and ethnicization of the socialist state.…”
Section: Ethnicization and Folklorization Of Musicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Soviet Union, folk music and folklore were important parts of the state program to highlight socialist national identities as symbolic markers of nationhood: "Folklore in the Soviet Union has been used consciously for propagating the cultural construction and political education of the masses for one goal -the realization of socialism and communism" (Oinas 1975). Backed up by the propaganda project launched by Lenin, traditional music was appropriated, reworked, and redeployed for propaganda purposes as "new wine in old bottles" (Harris and Norton 2002). This section reveals how music played a role in the process of folklorization and ethnicization of the socialist state.…”
Section: Ethnicization and Folklorization Of Musicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In exploring the cultural history of the PRC, quite a few scholars focus on the processes by which official ideology established its dominant position in the cultural realm and depict the CCP's cultural reforms in the "Seventeen Years" (1949)(1950)(1951)(1952)(1953)(1954)(1955)(1956)(1957)(1958)(1959)(1960)(1961)(1962)(1963)(1964)(1965)(1966) as a precursor to the Cultural Revolution (e.g., Jones, 1992;Chang, 1997: 76-126;Hung, 2005: 82-99;Hung, 2011;Liu, 2009: 387-406). This trend also exists in the scholarship on culture and politics in other socialist countries, which emphasizes political interference in cultural production while paying little attention to the agency of society (Taylor, 1998;Harris and Norton, 2002;Dobrenko, 2005;Ezrahi, 2012). In the past two decades, scholars have started to shed light on the cultural market in Maoist China and have reexamined the effectiveness of state control over the cultural realm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%