2012
DOI: 10.1386/jwcs.5.2.131_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Reporting war – history, professionalism and technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To sum up, the various domain of influences on news reporting has been intensively discussed in the literature (Hussain, 2019;Musa and Yushau, 2013;Crawford & Davies, 2014;Smith & Higgins, 2012;Orgeret, 2015;Hoiby, 2019;Reese, 2019;Jan & Hussain, 2020;Ola, 2020;Ashraf &Brooten, 2017 andJamil, 2017). In the literature, the gender aspect of journalism has also been analyzed by Orgeret (2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To sum up, the various domain of influences on news reporting has been intensively discussed in the literature (Hussain, 2019;Musa and Yushau, 2013;Crawford & Davies, 2014;Smith & Higgins, 2012;Orgeret, 2015;Hoiby, 2019;Reese, 2019;Jan & Hussain, 2020;Ola, 2020;Ashraf &Brooten, 2017 andJamil, 2017). In the literature, the gender aspect of journalism has also been analyzed by Orgeret (2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a vast body of literature concerning the risks faced by journalists during reporting from the conflict zone (Schneider, 2009;Allan & Zelizer, 2004;Crawford & Davies, 2014;Smith & Higgins, 2012;and Düsterhöft, 2013). There is increasing evidence that conflict journalism demands a more analytic outlook involving risking ground field reporting.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the mid-nineteenth century onwards, professional war correspondents became part of every major newspaper's staff, reporting exclusively for their papers and sending eyewitness accounts of what happened on the battlefield. They were registered ('accredited') with the army and allowed to use the military telegraph for sending their dispatches; and in case they were captured by the enemy they were entitled to be treated as prisoners of war (Smith and Higgings 2012;Williams 2012, 345). However, this closeness to the war scene had its price.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%