Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fracture modeling strategy is valid if fractures are more permeable than the matrix, that is, it is limited to fractures being channels for flow drainage (Segura & Carol, 2008b,a; Jha & Juanes, 2014; Cueto‐Felgueroso et al., 2017, 2018; Andrés et al., 2021). This approach agrees with proposals of other authors to deal with the fracture network modeling (McClure & Horne, 2013; Garipov & Hui, 2019; Berre et al., 2020), including the full simulation of matrix and fractures with poroelastic coupling. It also allows to vary parameters such as fracture aperture or porosity depending on the stress or strain level, although this barely affects the results (see Appendix ) (Bandis et al., 1983; Chin et al., 2000; Hsiung et al., 2005; Rutqvist et al., 2005; Cappa & Rutqvist, 2011).…”
Section: Background and Methodologysupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This fracture modeling strategy is valid if fractures are more permeable than the matrix, that is, it is limited to fractures being channels for flow drainage (Segura & Carol, 2008b,a; Jha & Juanes, 2014; Cueto‐Felgueroso et al., 2017, 2018; Andrés et al., 2021). This approach agrees with proposals of other authors to deal with the fracture network modeling (McClure & Horne, 2013; Garipov & Hui, 2019; Berre et al., 2020), including the full simulation of matrix and fractures with poroelastic coupling. It also allows to vary parameters such as fracture aperture or porosity depending on the stress or strain level, although this barely affects the results (see Appendix ) (Bandis et al., 1983; Chin et al., 2000; Hsiung et al., 2005; Rutqvist et al., 2005; Cappa & Rutqvist, 2011).…”
Section: Background and Methodologysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Thus, we employ here linear poroelasticity to investigate the impact of medium heterogeneity on flow and deformation in highly heterogeneous fractured media. In numerical models, discrete fractures are often incorporated as lower-dimensional objects combined with a rigorous coupling between matrix and fracture flow and deformation that allow the continuity of fluid flow and displacements (Segura & Carol, 2008a;McClure & Horne, 2013;Jha & Juanes, 2014;Berre et al, 2019Berre et al, , 2020. The density and length distribution of fractures in natural systems is large and uncertain enough so that the discrete fractures cannot be fully incorporated in explicit models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can speculate that the use of more complex models that include shear stress and wear processes can strongly improve the prediction of transmissivity with shear displacement (Aghababaei et al, 2016;Frérot et al, 2019;Milanese et al, 2019;Molinari et al, 2018;Shvarts & Yastrebov, 2018a, 2018bShvarts, 2019;Yastrebov et al, 2017). The results obtained for a single rough-fault could then be input into discrete fracture models (DFMs) to evaluate the hydraulic transport in fracture networks (McClure & Horne, 2013).…”
Section: Discussion and Implications For Geo-energy Reservoirsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess fluid flow and bedrock strain evolution, we use a continuous approach instead of Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM) or Discrete Fracture Network (DFN) formulations in which fractures are modeled (e.g. McClure and Horne, 2013;Wang, 2015). Because fluid flow in geothermal systems is heavily controlled by the presence of fracture networks (Sanderson and Nixon, 2015), advantages and limitations of our modelling approach exist when comparing it against those approaches.…”
Section: Numerical and Mechanical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their development is still, to our knowledge, limited to small domains, with high numerical cost. Similarly, DFN three-dimensional models still need to be developed (McClure and Horne, 2013). Even though traditional FEM is not able to represent fractures, its robustness allow to tackle large and complex 3D geometries, at a lower computational cost.…”
Section: Numerical and Mechanical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%