The Language of Electroacoustic Music 1986
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-18492-7_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The categorical analysis of the experiment results presented here highlights a substantial variety from one piece to another in terms of the cognitive determinants of the listener experience. In 1986, the composer Simon Emmerson suggested that even if the artist is not interested in manipulating the images associated with electronic music, the duality between mimetic and abstract contents must at least be taken into account (Emmerson 1986: 19). In the same article, Emmerson called for future research to investigate ‘deeper levels of symbolic representation and communication’ (21).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The categorical analysis of the experiment results presented here highlights a substantial variety from one piece to another in terms of the cognitive determinants of the listener experience. In 1986, the composer Simon Emmerson suggested that even if the artist is not interested in manipulating the images associated with electronic music, the duality between mimetic and abstract contents must at least be taken into account (Emmerson 1986: 19). In the same article, Emmerson called for future research to investigate ‘deeper levels of symbolic representation and communication’ (21).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luc Ferrari’s reference to his ‘anecdotal’ recordings and to groundbreaking pieces such as Presque Rien No. 1 (Ferrari 1970) as ‘electroacoustic nature photographs’ (Pauli 1971: 41 in Emmerson 1986: 34–5) implies both the documenting and the framing of a landscape, and highlights the consequent subject–object relationship between photographer and landscape that we might associate with the capturing and collecting of photographs. We can track the development of the relationship between sound recordist and soundscape – as sonic/spatial self-narrative – through subsequent works in the field.…”
Section: Soundscape Composition As Self-narrativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Simon Emmerson proposes a ‘Language Grid’ using the dichotomies of ‘abstract’ vs ‘abstracted’ syntax and ‘aural’ vs ‘mimetic’ discourse (Emmerson 1986: 17–21) (Figure 4). By syntax, Emmerson is referring to the way that the composer arranges material – meaning that material can be arranged in an ‘abstract’ way such as by using mathematical models or other systems (as in Boulez or Stockhausen) or by using an ‘abstracted’, intuitive approach.…”
Section: The Audio Reality Effect and The Current State Of Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By syntax, Emmerson is referring to the way that the composer arranges material – meaning that material can be arranged in an ‘abstract’ way such as by using mathematical models or other systems (as in Boulez or Stockhausen) or by using an ‘abstracted’, intuitive approach. By ‘aural’ discourse, Emmerson means basically the same as the classic ‘abstract/absolute’ musical category and by ‘mimetic’ discourse, Emmerson means music that makes use of materials which appear to be derived from everyday sounds (Emmerson 1986: 17–19, 24). In essence, Emmerson creates a grid that encompasses the continuum of compositional approaches from ‘abstract’ to ‘programmatic’ and from ‘intuitive’ to ‘systematic’ using my own terminology.
Figure 4 Fischman’s graph of Emmerson’s Language Grid with my axis labels (Fischman 2008: 112).
…”
Section: The Audio Reality Effect and The Current State Of Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%