The Routledge Handbook of Remix Studies and Digital Humanities 2021
DOI: 10.4324/9780429355875-00
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reworking is often referred to as bricolage, a form of sculpture that is based on the "creative reassembly of already-significant elements" (Lee, 2020). Such mixing and remixing is a widespread phenomenon (Navas & Gallagher, 2014), in which material is transformed, reused and reconstituted to deliver new values, often through participatory processes (Munro et al, 2023).…”
Section: Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reworking is often referred to as bricolage, a form of sculpture that is based on the "creative reassembly of already-significant elements" (Lee, 2020). Such mixing and remixing is a widespread phenomenon (Navas & Gallagher, 2014), in which material is transformed, reused and reconstituted to deliver new values, often through participatory processes (Munro et al, 2023).…”
Section: Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, by singling out two key concepts-appropriation and authorshipfrom earlier remix research as the primary tools for our analysis, we aspire for a detailed examination of countermedia as opposed to a general evaluation of the compatibility between our theoretical and empirical material. The concept of appropriation is applied as an overall tool to analyse how the new works comment, critique, recontextualise, or explicitly disregard the content and aesthetics of the source material (Navas et al, 2015b). In analysing authorship, our approach is on a more ideological level, as we scrutinise the implications of naming or neglecting to name authors.…”
Section: Remix As a Theory And An Ideologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of remix has been used to describe a variety of, most often, artistic practices that appropriate and recombine existing media content to create new works. A common feature in its application has been questioning the authority of discrete authored works, often in conjunction with a call to democratise cultural production from dominant (economic) institutions in favour of the amateur (Gunkel, 2016;Navas et al, 2015b). Remix is, as such, not only a theory of appropriation but also a concept that describes a larger ideological position brought about with digital media technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper considers the musical creativity of DJing practice from the perspective of Human Information Behaviour. Information Science research into music has so far not considered DJs, however, the practice of DJing can be viewed as musically creative, with remixing practices at its core (Navas and Gallagher, 2014), and as a rich vein of novel perspective for the field. Parallels have also been drawn between the practice of DJing and of information professionals, such as librarians, in their synthesising of information for others (Kumasi, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remixing practices are widespread in our contemporary and participatory culture (Navas and Gallagher, 2014), including but not limited to DJing, visual arts, video games, genetic engineering, food and more. DJs critically deconstruct, transform, contrast, reuse, reconstitute and combine music to produce novel creative outputs that deliver new value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%