The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2014.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction of temporal sub-stepping in the Multi-Level Multi-Domain semi-implicit Particle-In-Cell code Parsek2D-MLMD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this particular case, we use sufficiently high resolutions (verified in previous work (yu Wang, Jiang & nian Wang 2010;Jiang et al 2011;Peng et al 2018)) to be able to resolve the fast spatial and temporal oscillations of the ambipolar electric field. Semi-implicit, adaptive methods for kinetic plasma simulations have been developed to be able to self-consistently include higher resolution areas in low resolution domains (Innocenti et al 2013(Innocenti et al , 2015 and will be used in the future for similar simulations. To make sure that the configuration we reach is stable, we run our simulations up to 25 ms, compatibly with experimental data.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this particular case, we use sufficiently high resolutions (verified in previous work (yu Wang, Jiang & nian Wang 2010;Jiang et al 2011;Peng et al 2018)) to be able to resolve the fast spatial and temporal oscillations of the ambipolar electric field. Semi-implicit, adaptive methods for kinetic plasma simulations have been developed to be able to self-consistently include higher resolution areas in low resolution domains (Innocenti et al 2013(Innocenti et al , 2015 and will be used in the future for similar simulations. To make sure that the configuration we reach is stable, we run our simulations up to 25 ms, compatibly with experimental data.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The jumps in spatial and temporal resolution between the levels are indicated as Refinement Factor, RF = ∆x/δx, and Time Ratio, T R = ∆t/δt, where ∆ and δ label the resolution on the coarse and refined grid. Refinement Factors and Time Ratios as high as RF = 14 and T R = 10 have been used in Innocenti et al 35 . The refined grid in a two level MLMD system has a spatial extension L x /RF × L y /RF , with L x and L y the dimensions of the coarse grid.…”
Section: The Multi Level Multi Domain Methods and Its Application mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim is to reduce the computational cost of the simulations while retaining fundamental characteristics: a fully kinetic description of both ions and electrons, realistic simulation parameters and a wide range of wavelengths. The method proposed, the Multi Level Multi Domain method [33][34][35] , is demonstrated through the simulation, at realistic mass ratio, of turbulence generated by the Lower Hybrid Drift Instability (LHDI). In the case of the LHDI, the use of high mass ratios is essential to ensure a clear separation between the electron and the ion scales 36 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to the semi-implicit IMM temporal discretization, the temporal and spatial resolution of the code can be adapted to the scale of the processes under investigation rather than being tied to the strict stability constraints of explicit discretizations. This property is massively exploited in the Multi-Level Multi-Domain evolution of iPic3D, where several grid levels are resolved with different spatial and temporal resolutions to catch progressively smaller scale processes (Innocenti et al 2013(Innocenti et al , 2015(Innocenti et al , 2016. Other, non semi-implicit, fully kinetic implementations of similar EB formulations are Sironi & Narayan (2015) and Ahmadi et al (2017), where the compression (rather than expansion) of the plasma mimics collisionless accretion flow and magnetopause compression respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%