Introduction of Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation into Nursing Practice: A Prospective Study

Achrekar, Meera Sharad; Murthy, Vedang; Kanan, Sadhana; Shetty, Rani; Nair, Mini; Khattry, Navin

doi:10.4103/2347-5625.178171

Cited by 46 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This study was somewhat consistent with the findings of Achrekar et al: The majority (68%) of the nurses stated that they had completed documentation in 5-10 min, 21% of the nurses stated that the SBAR form was very time consuming, while 42% and 37% opined "somewhat" and "not at all", respectively. [34] Research introduced many components for consideration with regard to standardized handoff communication. The main approach to effective handoff reporting was creating a standardized process.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nurses’ perceptions regarding using the SBAR tool for handoff communication in a tertiary cancer center in Qatar

Nagammal¹,

Nashwan²,

Nair³

et al. 2016

JNEP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Communication failure has been reported in the literature as the primary source of medical errors and patient harm. Among various methods of handoff communication, Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation (SBAR) is a reliable and efficient framework that nurses worldwide use. The investigators sought to assess the perceptions of nurses with regard to using the SBAR tool for hand-off communication at a cancer hospital in Qatar. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out to assess perceptions regarding the use of SBAR among 117 staff nurses working in inpatient units of National Center for Cancer Care and Research (NCCCR). A handover evaluation tool was used, enabling nurses to self-report their perceptions. Results: The majority of staff nurses opined that SBAR followed a logical sequence, with a reduction in communication errors after its use. Also, 53.9% of the nurses reported that they would always recommend the SBAR framework in other areas. The majority (87.3%) of the nurses had good perceptions regarding the use of the SBAR framework, and none of them had poor perceptions regarding the same. The mean duration of handovers reduced after their use of SBAR. There was no association between perceptions and demographic variables. Conclusions: SBAR is safe and efficient, and it can be recommended for all healthcare settings. The SBAR communication technique provides an organized logical sequence and improved communication that has been proved to ensure patient safety.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nurses’ perceptions regarding using the SBAR tool for handoff communication in a tertiary cancer center in Qatar

Nagammal¹,

Nashwan²,

Nair³

et al. 2016

JNEP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[19] The patient, who is the focus of all interaction, should be involved in decision-making and updated with information relevant to them, which in turn will help to create a sense of well-being and satisfaction. [20]…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of booklet on male sexual dysfunction, its measures and assessing its impact on knowledge of patients with urological cancers

Chellayadhas

Achrekar

Bakshi

et al. 2016

Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective:Urological cancer and its surgeries have great impact on male sexuality which could have physical or emotional consequences. In India, speaking openly about the sexual matter is a taboo and an aspect considered forbidden. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to develop an information booklet about male sexual dysfunction and assess its impact on knowledge of patients with urological cancers.Methods:Information booklet was developed after literature review, and its content validity was established. Reliability of the questionnaire was 0.95. A randomized control trail using pre- and post-test design was used for 30 male urological cancer patients and was assigned to experimental group (15) who received information booklet and control group (15) who received standard treatment. Subjects in the experimental group were provided with opinionnaire during posttest. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.Results:In experimental group, 40% of the subjects were ≤ 40 years, whereas 27% in the control group (P = 0.699). The pre- and post-mean difference score was significantly higher in experimental group (mean difference - 5) than control group (mean difference - 0.4). All subjects (100%) opined that the information booklet was useful, adequate, self-explanatory, sequential, and clear.Conclusions:Information in the booklet will help subjects to understand the common sexual problems after urological surgeries and help them to cope with the problems, thereby improving their quality of life.

show abstract

“…55 It is crucial to keep in mind that the information provided during handovers of patients or shifts will influence the delivery of care for the whole shift and important or critical information can be lost, leading to gaps in patient care. 57 The use of the SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation) tool, with the due adaptations for communicating critical information, is recommended 58 :…”

Section: Communication Among Professionals (Radiographers Radiologismentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient safety in medical imaging: A joint paper of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS)

2019

Radiography

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

a b s t r a c tThe fundamental professional roles of radiographers and radiologists are focused on providing benefit to patients with our skills, while maintaining their safety at all times. There are numerous patient safety issues in radiology which must be considered. These encompass: protection from direct harm arising from the techniques and technologies we use; ensuring physical and psychological well-being of patients while under our care; maintaining the highest possible quality of service provision; and protecting the staff to ensure they can deliver safe services. This paper summarises the key categories of safety issues in the provision of radiology services, from the joint perspectives of radiographers and radiologists, and provides references for further reading in all major relevant areas. This is a joint statement of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS), published simultaneously in Insights into Imaging [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0721-y] and Radiography [

show abstract

Introduction of Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation into Nursing Practice: A Prospective Study

Cited by 46 publications

References 12 publications

Nurses’ perceptions regarding using the SBAR tool for handoff communication in a tertiary cancer center in Qatar

Nurses’ perceptions regarding using the SBAR tool for handoff communication in a tertiary cancer center in Qatar

Development of booklet on male sexual dysfunction, its measures and assessing its impact on knowledge of patients with urological cancers

Patient safety in medical imaging: A joint paper of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About