2016
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/157/1/012013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction of Enhanced Compressive Residual Stress Profiles in Aerospace Components Using Combined Mechanical Surface Treatments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be observed that transverse direction shows higher surface stress values than longitudinal direction by 110-830% range which is consistent with the other researchers' findings [21][22][23]. It could be due to the bow wave generated in advance of rolling direction and relatively more material is pushed in transverse direction than longitudinal [24]. Also, this could be due to the atomic rearrangement in the rolling direction through sink-in and pile-up mechanism unlike in transverse direction [25].…”
Section: Compressive Residual Stress Distributionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It can be observed that transverse direction shows higher surface stress values than longitudinal direction by 110-830% range which is consistent with the other researchers' findings [21][22][23]. It could be due to the bow wave generated in advance of rolling direction and relatively more material is pushed in transverse direction than longitudinal [24]. Also, this could be due to the atomic rearrangement in the rolling direction through sink-in and pile-up mechanism unlike in transverse direction [25].…”
Section: Compressive Residual Stress Distributionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This indicates that the impact of vibropeening with 8 h treatment time have reduced in intensity or energy, or that the imparted stress has possibly been relaxed after 8 h. On the other hand, in the longitudinal direction, the residual stress profile after 4 h treatment time is better than 8 h, with higher maximum compressive residual stress and a greater depth of influence. This proves that there could be stress relaxation with longer treatment time, which could negate the positive impact of vibropeening on the components [5]. This is essential to provide an understanding of the optimal process time for vibropeening.…”
Section: Process Timementioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, this depends on the properties of each material, such as elastic modulus, hardness, and ductility, to name a few. Therefore, it is important to determine the saturation point of the treating material to avoid over-peening, when the residual stress profile will not have any improvement further or will even deteriorate [5].…”
Section: Process Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, studies on deep rolling coupled with heat treatment and/or elevated temperature [73][74][75][76], cryogenic treatment [39,77], aging [56], and certain surface treatments like shot peening [78,79], burnishing [80], and ultrasonic-induced hammering [81][82][83][84] were testified in the recent past. The major objective was to complement DR with the advantages of the latter.…”
Section: The Deep Rolling Processmentioning
confidence: 99%