Interculturalism and Performance Now 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02704-9_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: New Directions?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last decade, alongside my own, several key and vital publications have positioned new modes of interculturalisms as minoritized subject-driven political and aesthetic movement in theater and dance sectors in the Global North (Knowles 2010; McIvor 2016; McIvor and King 2019; Lei and McIvor 2020). These collective voices have situated the central concerns of power and agency, reclaimed by minoritized artists from the ground up, as integral to the spirit of new interculturalisms, most strongly exemplified in the work on “scalar interculturalism” by Justine Nakase (2019).…”
Section: New Interculturalism Intersectionality and Inter-epistemic Knowledge Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, alongside my own, several key and vital publications have positioned new modes of interculturalisms as minoritized subject-driven political and aesthetic movement in theater and dance sectors in the Global North (Knowles 2010; McIvor 2016; McIvor and King 2019; Lei and McIvor 2020). These collective voices have situated the central concerns of power and agency, reclaimed by minoritized artists from the ground up, as integral to the spirit of new interculturalisms, most strongly exemplified in the work on “scalar interculturalism” by Justine Nakase (2019).…”
Section: New Interculturalism Intersectionality and Inter-epistemic Knowledge Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the hybridity of performance cultures in A Shakespearean Handan Dream is not just representative of the status quo in many parts of the world; it is also instrumental in being instructive about what will come in the future. In this globalizing world, intercultural theater has an active role to play as an intervention into our culture and society, and it thus distinguishes itself from the previous paradigms of interculturalism in theater (see McIvor, 2019, 1–26). Studies in new interculturalism show that it is necessary to intersect interculturalism with other important issues, such as ethnicity, the refugee crisis, gender, war, and epidemic, as many of them have been the concerns of the intercultural performances by Jerzy Grotowski, Peter Brook, Ariane Mnouchkine, Eugenio Barba, and Richard Schechner.…”
Section: Performance As Cross‐cultural Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process of the Sino‐British co‐production, the two performance cultures are kept intact, fostering an equal, dialogic, and mutually‐enriching relationship. Featuring a specific kind of “new interculturalism” (McIvor, 2019, 2), the performance became a huge success, as it generated lively discussions not just in transnational theatrical circles but also in the mass media in both countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, studies on intercultural theater and performance have witnessed the rise of “new interculturalism” (McIvor, 2019, 4), a paradigm emphasizing the perspective of the subaltern and local routes of intercultural interaction embedded in concrete material conditions of gender, race, and geography. Theater of new interculturalism complicates the West–East binary, leading scholars to distinguish it from “hegemonic intercultural theater” (HIT), a label assigned by Daphne Lei to intercultural theater works that combine “First World capital and brainpower with Third World raw material and labor, and Western classical texts with Eastern performance traditions” (Lei, 2011, 571).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%