The Economic Effects of Trade Unions in Japan 2000
DOI: 10.1057/9780333983805_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EAs offer employees a means to resolve employee grievances to the same degree as unions. However, enterprise unions in Japan are unenthusiastic about obtaining wage premiums (Hara and Kawaguchi, 2008; Tachibanaki and Noda, 2000; Tsuru and Rebizer, 1995). Therefore, even if genuine unions replace EAs, they are unlikely to deliver the additional benefit of wage premiums.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EAs offer employees a means to resolve employee grievances to the same degree as unions. However, enterprise unions in Japan are unenthusiastic about obtaining wage premiums (Hara and Kawaguchi, 2008; Tachibanaki and Noda, 2000; Tsuru and Rebizer, 1995). Therefore, even if genuine unions replace EAs, they are unlikely to deliver the additional benefit of wage premiums.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They witness cooperative labor–management relationships with the unions at their parent firms, acknowledging the significance of the collective voice. Hence, they are sympathetic toward unions and consider Japanese enterprise unions necessary for productivity enhancement (Morikawa, 2010; Tachibanaki and Noda, 2000).…”
Section: Japanese Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%