Distributed Learning 2017
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100598-9.00001-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not code the “suprapatella” here, as there is substantial confusion over its homology. We used two phylogenetic optimization methods in Mesquite software (Maddison & Maddison, 2017) to reconstruct possible evolutionary polarity of the patella in the clade Mammaliamorpha (with a focus on Mammaliaformes), as follows. First, for broad reconstruction across Tetrapoda, we used a phylogeny based on Gauthier, Estes & De Queiroz (1988) and Shedlock & Edwards (2009), with average branch lengths they derived from several studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We did not code the “suprapatella” here, as there is substantial confusion over its homology. We used two phylogenetic optimization methods in Mesquite software (Maddison & Maddison, 2017) to reconstruct possible evolutionary polarity of the patella in the clade Mammaliamorpha (with a focus on Mammaliaformes), as follows. First, for broad reconstruction across Tetrapoda, we used a phylogeny based on Gauthier, Estes & De Queiroz (1988) and Shedlock & Edwards (2009), with average branch lengths they derived from several studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This raises the question whether this patella represents independent, convergent evolutionary origins in the Eutheria and Monotremata, or an ancestral origin for all three groups, with loss of the ossified patella amongst most Metatheria. To address this question, we conducted phylogenetic character mapping with Mesquite software (Maddison & Maddison, 2017) that reconstructed patellar evolution in Mammalia. Using likelihood methods, we also traced the most likely pattern of evolution over existing phylogenies, and considered alternate proposed topologies to test how they affected our reconstructions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data matrix was created and edited in Mesquite ver. 2.6 ( Maddison & Maddison, 2017 ). Strict consensus cladograms were obtained by using TNT ( Goloboff, Farris & Nixon, 2008 ) based on 60 adult morphological characters (after Blagoderov, Hippa & Nel (2010) ) (matrix shown in Table S1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…from British Columbia, Canada (Layton, Martel & Hebert, 2014; KF643882). These sequences were aligned without indels using the program MAFFT (Katoh & Standley, 2013) in Mesquite (Maddison & Maddison, 2017). Absolute distances and uncorrected pairwise distances between sequences were generated in PAUP, version 4.0a151 (Swofford, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%