Intersections of Ageing, Gender and Sexualities 2019
DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781447333029.003.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: intersections of ageing, gender and sexualities

Abstract: This opening chapter details how this book emerged and developed, its key themes and structure. In so doing, the chapter will discuss intersectionality, multi-disciplinarity and why this is a timely and important edited collection. The chapter discusses how it is important that the intersections of ageing, gender and sexualities are considered together, alongside other sources of social division and identity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LGBT+ older people for a number of reasons may not have the expansive family networks of support as they enter old age when compared to people who do not identify as LGBT+ (Choi and Meyer, 2016; O'Reilly et al , 2018). This may lead to more loneliness and isolation, which has been associated with poorer mental and physical health and avoidance of accessing timely support (Frederick-Goldsen et al , 2013; King et al , 2017, 2019). Studies also indicate that their life stories and relationships are overlooked and undervalued when they interact with care services (Almack et al , 2010; Higgins et al , 2012; Westwood et al , 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LGBT+ older people for a number of reasons may not have the expansive family networks of support as they enter old age when compared to people who do not identify as LGBT+ (Choi and Meyer, 2016; O'Reilly et al , 2018). This may lead to more loneliness and isolation, which has been associated with poorer mental and physical health and avoidance of accessing timely support (Frederick-Goldsen et al , 2013; King et al , 2017, 2019). Studies also indicate that their life stories and relationships are overlooked and undervalued when they interact with care services (Almack et al , 2010; Higgins et al , 2012; Westwood et al , 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most importantly, diversification of intervention content and patient and public involvement in the design, delivery and evaluation of educational interventions could improve efforts and have a more sustained impact on LGBT+ ageing inequalities (Jurček et al , 2021). Further, LGBT+ older people do not form a homogenous group and have multiple and complex identities including, ethnicity, gender, disability, class, geographic location, religion and age (King et al , 2017, 2019). Intersectional approaches to understand how belonging to a number of different minority populations can lead to increased resilience and unique positive ways of being (Leonard and Mann, 2018; King et al , 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(We use the term LGBT with a plus (+) sign to signal inclusion of the wide diversity of sexual and gender identities, unless the paper being cited is focused on specific identities). Inequalities are compounded by the cumulative effects of lifelong exposure to prejudice, discrimination, criminalisation [ 6 ] and environmental factors nuanced by a wide range of intersecting identities, including socio-economic status, culture, race and ethnicity, disability and religion [ 7 ]. These unique circumstances impacting on ageing experience for LGBT+ people pose risks linked to minority stress [ 8 ] and stress adaptation in later life [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study also found that female staff in the private sector in Finland and Scotland experienced gendered ageism, as shown by comments concerning women’s roles, looks, sexual availability, possible pregnancy and menopause (Jyrkinen and McKie 2012 ). King et al ( 2019 ) argued that an intersectionality perspective may be helpful for comprehending the intersections of multiple structures of inequalities, including age and gender. Given the interlocking nature of age and gender systems, Krekula et al ( 2018 ) emphasized “the need to understand the powerful alongside the powerless” as a means of opening “a discourse of mutual shaping while recognizing the flexibility and the unfinished projects of creating differences” (p. 36).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%