2019
DOI: 10.1080/20421338.2018.1530406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

INTRODUCTION: Importance of methodological diversity for innovation system studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the multiple-case design analysis (Yin, 2013) and performing 26 interviews in both EEs and collecting secondary data (Pugh et al, 2016;Raunio et al, 2019), we develop a process for comparing two very different EEs and in two institutional and geographical contexts. In doing so we take the extent literature out of the comfort zone by critically analyzing how EE taxonomy may differ conditional on geographical context-Istanbul and Greater Reading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the multiple-case design analysis (Yin, 2013) and performing 26 interviews in both EEs and collecting secondary data (Pugh et al, 2016;Raunio et al, 2019), we develop a process for comparing two very different EEs and in two institutional and geographical contexts. In doing so we take the extent literature out of the comfort zone by critically analyzing how EE taxonomy may differ conditional on geographical context-Istanbul and Greater Reading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By applying the multiple-case design (Yin, 2013), two types of data were collected. Primary data were collected from interviews and secondary data from research centers' websites and blogs, regional reports of LEPs, companies' websites, think-tank reports, brochures, company's newsletters, and conference papers (Baines & Cunningham, 2013;Raunio et al, 2019) as well as conference presentations, business meetings with EE actors, and further team embeddedness in the ecosystem (Eisenhardt, 1989;Spradley, 1980).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It involves the interplay of human and non-human actors with adoption a complex and ongoing process. Understanding the relationship of ICT adoption and family dynamics (Tadpatrikar, Sharma & Viswanath, 2021;Sharaievska, 2017;Romero-Ruiz et al, 2017;Carvalho et al, 2016;Carvalho, Francisco & Relvas 2014), and the linkages among the actors involved in an innovation is key to the improvement and acceptability of digital technology (Raunio et al, 2019). Previous research (Petrescu & Krishen 2019;Midgley et al 2017) confirms the strength in using a diversity of methods and analytics in exploring adoption.…”
Section: Is Ivr Not Viewed As the Way Forward For Education Collaborative Entertainment And Social Engagement For Children? Especially Inmentioning
confidence: 95%