2018
DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2017.1388463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: identity, jeopardy and moral dilemmas in conducting research in ‘risky’ environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social researchers need to be conscious of their identities and adapt their behaviours as a result. This reinforces the point that a great deal of AMR research is about understanding how to navigate complex relationships in sensitive, and sometimes risky, policy and cultural spaces (Marks & Abdelhalim, 2018 ). Achieving buy‐in from those parties who ultimately need to change their behaviours, including industry, policymakers, and communities is crucial, and, in fact, is a matter for social scientists.…”
Section: Social‐science Research Is Fundamentalsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Social researchers need to be conscious of their identities and adapt their behaviours as a result. This reinforces the point that a great deal of AMR research is about understanding how to navigate complex relationships in sensitive, and sometimes risky, policy and cultural spaces (Marks & Abdelhalim, 2018 ). Achieving buy‐in from those parties who ultimately need to change their behaviours, including industry, policymakers, and communities is crucial, and, in fact, is a matter for social scientists.…”
Section: Social‐science Research Is Fundamentalsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The ethnographic field study brought the researcher close to stigmatised or even legally sanctionable actions (Ferrell & Hamm, 1998; Lyng, 1998). Arrival, as an extreme context, is a ‘risky’ research environment, due to its ‘near-constant exposure to potentially extreme events’ (Hällgren et al, 2018, p. 117), in our case physical violence, in which ‘researchers can become ethnographers of brutality and hostility’ (Marks & Abdelhalim, 2018, p. 307). Yet, the researcher was only at risk to a limited degree: he neither participated in violent practices, nor was he ever the target of violence committed by guards or Arrival’s inhabitants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%